From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
To: Heinz Graalfs <graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: "mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"oprofile-list@lists.sf.net" <oprofile-list@lists.sf.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
"borntraeger@de.ibm.com" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v2 0/3] OProfile support for System z's hardware sampling
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:42:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110214194206.GW5874@erda.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110121100651.821690659@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Heinz,
On 21.01.11 05:06:51, Heinz Graalfs wrote:
> I'm resending yesterday's mail because I missed to specify the correct sender information.
>
> This is a re-posting of the patch series originally posted last month:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-s390&m=129285043619973&w=2
>
> Heinz
>
> Changes in
>
> v2:
> - kernel module hwsampler removed, everything is now in oprofile kernel module
> - functions from hwsampler-main.c and smpctl.c merged into arch/s390/oprofile/hwsampler.c
> - functions made static
> - arch/s390/include/asm/hwsampler.h moved to arch/s390/oprofile/hwsampler.h
> - structs have now hws_ prefix
> - config variables changed, HAVE_HWSAMPLER used only
> - original patch 4 (handle_munmap.patch) removed
thanks for you patches, I have applied them with modifications to:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rric/oprofile.git s390
For atomic compilation of single patches I changed patch order and the
Makefile where necessary. The branch also includes my follow-on
patches.
I will be travelling the next weeks and wanted to have this series in
linux-next now for later inclusion to .39. We would run out of time
otherwise (my bad). Please review and test the changes I made and send
me possibly updates.
Though I applied the patches I want to have the following changes:
* Merge init.c and hwsampler_file.c, two files are bloated here and
hwsampler_file.c is a bad and too long naming.
* Rework functions in cpu_buffer.c (log_sample,
__oprofile_add_ext_sample, oprofile_add_ext_hw_sample, etc.). All
the (static) functions can be merged to a single functino by
implementing a struct that holds all current function arguments.
Something like:
static void __oprofile_add_ext_sample(struct *foobar fb);
void oprofile_add_sample(struct pt_regs * const regs, unsigned long event)
{
struct foobar fb = { .regs = regs, .event = event };
__oprofile_add_ext_sample(&fb);
}
The naming and description of oprofile_add_ext_hw_sample() is also
not the best. As interface in include/linux/oprofile.h we could then
merge oprofile_add_ext_sample() and oprofile_add_ext_hw_sample() to
a single function.
It would be nice if you could implement this.
For all patches in the oprofile/s390 branch I also need the
s390 maintainer's ack.
Martin or Heiko, please ack.
Thanks,
-Robert
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-14 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-21 10:06 [patch v2 0/3] OProfile support for System z's hardware sampling Heinz Graalfs
2011-01-21 10:06 ` [patch v2 1/3] This patch adds support for hardware based sampling on System z processors (models z10 and up) Heinz Graalfs
2011-02-14 18:57 ` Robert Richter
2011-03-25 11:00 ` Robert Richter
2011-03-29 12:38 ` Heinz Graalfs
2011-01-21 10:06 ` [patch v2 2/3] This patch enhances OProfile to support System zs hardware sampling feature Heinz Graalfs
2011-02-14 19:01 ` Robert Richter
2011-02-14 19:03 ` Robert Richter
2011-02-14 19:05 ` [PATCH] oprofile, s390: Rework hwsampler implementation Robert Richter
2011-02-14 19:07 ` [PATCH] oprofile, s390: Fix section mismatch of function hws_cpu_callback() Robert Richter
2011-01-21 10:06 ` [patch v2 3/3] This patch introduces a new oprofile sample add function (oprofile_add_ext_hw_sample) Heinz Graalfs
2011-02-14 18:55 ` Robert Richter
2011-02-07 8:23 ` [patch v2 0/3] OProfile support for System z's hardware sampling Heinz Graalfs
2011-02-14 19:42 ` Robert Richter [this message]
2011-02-15 7:17 ` Heiko Carstens
2011-02-15 16:59 ` Heinz Graalfs
2011-02-15 17:29 ` Robert Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110214194206.GW5874@erda.amd.com \
--to=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oprofile-list@lists.sf.net \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox