public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xemul@openvz.org,
	sukadev@us.ibm.com, ebiederm@xmission.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pidns: Don't allow new pids after the namespace is dead.
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 19:30:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110215183028.GA15568@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297788824-20534-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@free.fr>

On 02/15, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> In the case of unsharing or joining a pid namespace, it becomes
> possible to attempt to allocate a pid after zap_pid_namespace has
> killed everything in the namespace.  Close the hole for now by simply
> not allowing any of those pid allocations to succeed.

Daniel, please explain more. It seems, a long ago I knew the reason
for this patch, but now I can't recall and can't understand this change.

> --- a/include/linux/pid_namespace.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pid_namespace.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ struct pid_namespace {
>  	struct kref kref;
>  	struct pidmap pidmap[PIDMAP_ENTRIES];
>  	int last_pid;
> +	atomic_t dead;

Why atomic_t? It is used as a plain boolean.

And I can't unde

> --- a/kernel/pid.c
> +++ b/kernel/pid.c
> @@ -282,6 +282,10 @@ struct pid *alloc_pid(struct pid_namespace *ns)
>  	struct pid_namespace *tmp;
>  	struct upid *upid;
>  
> +	pid = NULL;
> +	if (atomic_read(&ns->dead))
> +		goto out;
> +

So why this is needed?

If we see ns->dead != 0 we are already killed by zap_pid_ns_processes()
which sets ns->dead = 1.

Oleg.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-15 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-15 16:53 [PATCH 1/2] pidns: Don't allow new pids after the namespace is dead Daniel Lezcano
2011-02-15 16:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] pidns: Support unsharing the pid namespace Daniel Lezcano
2011-02-15 19:01   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-15 19:15     ` [PATCH 0/1] Was: " Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-15 19:17       ` [PATCH 1/1][3rd resend] sys_unshare: remove the dead CLONE_THREAD/SIGHAND/VM code Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-21  0:17         ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-02-16 23:47     ` [PATCH 2/2] pidns: Support unsharing the pid namespace Daniel Lezcano
2011-02-17 20:29       ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-17 22:35         ` Greg Kurz
2011-02-18 14:40           ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-24  1:12   ` Rob Landley
2011-02-15 18:30 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-02-16 23:21   ` [PATCH 1/2] pidns: Don't allow new pids after the namespace is dead Daniel Lezcano
2011-02-17 20:54     ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110215183028.GA15568@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@free.fr \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sukadev@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox