From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc5
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:19:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110216161929.GF22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110216160643.GE22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 04:06:43PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> Sigh... I see what's going on. We'd got inode from dentry that is getting
> crapped under us. We will *not* survive dropping RCU - it's bad enough for
> full restart in normal mode. So right after we'd seen that (already wrong)
> inode has ->follow_link(), we decide to drop RCU. Originally this BUG_ON
> hadn't been reached in that case - we had already failed with -ECHILD before
> we got to it. Now we don't...
>
> _However_, I don't like passing inode to do_follow_link(). I'd rather set
> nd->inode to inode first and use it there. Let me think a bit and see if
> it's feasible...
No, that won't do. The damn thing uses previous value of nd->inode if
it walks into relative symlink...
Let's shift that call of nameidata_dentry_drop_rcu_maybe() into both
callers of do_follow_link() instead. Marginally less obvious that we won't
reach the guts of do_follow_link() in RCU mode, just as obvious that overall
structure is ugly as hell and avoids making it even uglier by passing inode
down there. How about this:
diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index 9e701e2..d7003cf 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -800,10 +800,6 @@ static inline int do_follow_link(struct path *path, struct nameidata *nd)
void *cookie;
int err = -ELOOP;
- /* We drop rcu-walk here */
- if (nameidata_dentry_drop_rcu_maybe(nd, path->dentry))
- return -ECHILD;
-
if (current->link_count >= MAX_NESTED_LINKS)
goto loop;
if (current->total_link_count >= 40)
@@ -1413,6 +1409,9 @@ exec_again:
goto out_dput;
if (inode->i_op->follow_link) {
+ /* We drop rcu-walk here */
+ if (nameidata_dentry_drop_rcu_maybe(nd, next.dentry))
+ return -ECHILD;
BUG_ON(inode != next.dentry->d_inode);
err = do_follow_link(&next, nd);
if (err)
@@ -1458,6 +1457,8 @@ last_component:
break;
if (inode && unlikely(inode->i_op->follow_link) &&
(lookup_flags & LOOKUP_FOLLOW)) {
+ if (nameidata_dentry_drop_rcu_maybe(nd, next.dentry))
+ return -ECHILD;
BUG_ON(inode != next.dentry->d_inode);
err = do_follow_link(&next, nd);
if (err)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-16 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-16 4:16 Linux 2.6.38-rc5 Linus Torvalds
2011-02-16 11:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-16 13:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-16 15:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-16 16:06 ` Al Viro
2011-02-16 16:19 ` Al Viro [this message]
2011-02-16 16:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-16 16:39 ` Al Viro
2011-02-16 16:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-16 16:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-16 19:26 ` [PATCH] fix backlight brightness on intel LVDS panel after reopening lid Alex Riesen
2011-02-16 19:46 ` Alex Riesen
2011-02-16 19:54 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-02-16 19:59 ` Alex Riesen
2011-02-16 20:05 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-02-16 20:28 ` Alex Riesen
2011-02-17 1:41 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Do not handle backlight combination mode specially Indan Zupancic
2011-02-17 22:13 ` [PATCH] fix backlight brightness on intel LVDS panel after reopening lid Tino Keitel
2011-02-18 4:57 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-02-19 12:11 ` Alex Riesen
2011-02-19 12:26 ` Alex Riesen
2011-02-19 23:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-22 21:04 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-02-22 22:31 ` Tino Keitel
2011-02-23 1:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-04 6:53 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-03-04 18:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-04 23:32 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-03-06 17:40 ` Alex Riesen
2011-03-10 5:50 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-03-10 6:00 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-03-10 7:49 ` Takashi Iwai
2011-03-10 8:25 ` Takashi Iwai
2011-03-10 10:06 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-03-10 12:59 ` Takashi Iwai
2011-03-10 13:02 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Revive combination mode for backlight control Takashi Iwai
2011-03-10 19:36 ` Keith Packard
2011-03-11 1:30 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-03-11 1:23 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-03-11 1:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-11 7:26 ` Takashi Iwai
2011-03-11 9:08 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-03-11 7:34 ` Keith Packard
2011-03-10 8:45 ` [PATCH] fix backlight brightness on intel LVDS panel after reopening lid Indan Zupancic
2011-03-10 12:51 ` Takashi Iwai
2011-03-05 0:26 ` Peter Stuge
2011-02-23 1:32 ` Indan Zupancic
2011-02-20 14:03 ` Linux 2.6.38-rc5 Paul Rolland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110216161929.GF22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox