From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Subject: [kbuild] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:43:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110217124304.GA27504@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110217144743.2db26b27.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:42:59 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > x86_64-linux-gcc: arch/x86/lib/memmove_64.c: No such file or directory
> >
> > Caused by commit 9599ec0471deae24044241e2173090d2cbc0e899 ("x86-64, mem:
> > Convert memmove() to assembly file and fix return value bug") interacting
> > with our build system.
> >
> > After removing arch/x86/lib/.memmove_64.o.cmd (left over from the build
> > before merging the tip tree) from my object tree, it built correctly.
>
> I am still getting this (of course).
You reported this as a -tip build failure - but it appears to be some sort of kbuild
bug/artifact, right? There was a leftover .memmove_64.o.cmd file from an old tree.
When jumping between kernel versions via git checkout a 'make mrproper' is generally
needed. In most cases 'make' will figure things out but it's not always guaranteed.
So for example there are version transitions where a stale include/asm links could
cause build problems.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-17 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-31 4:42 linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-17 3:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-17 12:43 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-02-17 12:45 ` [kbuild] " Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-17 13:18 ` Michal Marek
2011-02-17 15:02 ` Michal Marek
2011-02-17 17:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-17 22:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-18 3:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110217124304.GA27504@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).