From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755964Ab1BRHeO (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2011 02:34:14 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:54314 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753027Ab1BRHeM (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2011 02:34:12 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:34:02 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Mike Travis Cc: Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Len Brown , Yinghai Lu , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] printk: Minimize time zero output Message-ID: <20110218073402.GF11404@elte.hu> References: <20110217185131.960038922@gulag1.americas.sgi.com> <20110217185132.576051720@gulag1.americas.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110217185132.576051720@gulag1.americas.sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Mike Travis wrote: > Reduce the length for time zero messages by only printing "[0] ". > > v2: updated to apply to x86-tip > > Signed-off-by: Mike Travis > Reviewed-by: Jack Steiner > Reviewed-by: Robin Holt > --- > kernel/printk.c | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > --- linux.orig/kernel/printk.c > +++ linux/kernel/printk.c > @@ -818,11 +818,13 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk(const char *fmt, > unsigned long nanosec_rem; > > t = cpu_clock(printk_cpu); > - nanosec_rem = do_div(t, 1000000000); > - tlen = sprintf(tbuf, "[%5lu.%06lu] ", > + if (likely(t)) { > + nanosec_rem = do_div(t, 1000000000); > + tlen = sprintf(tbuf, "[%5lu.%06lu] ", > (unsigned long) t, > nanosec_rem / 1000); The excessive number of very ugly linebreaks in this statement should have told you that the whole printk_time function wants to be broken out of vsprintk(), into a helper function. Please make it two patches: one cleanup-only patch that factors out the code, the second one that modifies it materially. Thanks, Ingo