From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@kernel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] pci/xen: Use xen_allocate_pirq_msi
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:07:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110218140729.GA8446@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110217143003.GE5987@dumpdata.com>
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 09:30:03AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 08:41:31AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 22:17 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > There is no need to use the old interface.
> >
> > xen_allocate_pirq -> xen_map_pirq_gsi -> PHYSDEVOP_alloc_irq_vector IFF
> > xen_initial_domain() in addition to the kernel side book-keeping side of
> > things (set chip and handler, update irq_info etc) whereas
> > xen_allocate_pirq_msi just does the kernel book keeping.
> >
> > Also xen_allocate_pirq allocates an IRQ in the 1-1 GSI space whereas
> > xen_allocate_pirq_msi allocates a dynamic one in the >GSI IRQ space.
>
> Which is OK. These are MSIs.
> >
> > So this change is actually a semantic change and not just a switch to a
> > new interface. I think the change is OK (because the caller is domU
>
> Right.
>
> > only?) but a comment explaining this would be appreciated.
>
> Correct: "domU side".
>
> Will fix it up.
How does this look to you?
>From eb832bece3131ecbdb509f7f2a9bc53f6692177c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:43:04 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] pci/xen: Use xen_allocate_pirq_msi instead of xen_allocate_pirq
xen_allocate_pirq -> xen_map_pirq_gsi -> PHYSDEVOP_alloc_irq_vector IFF
xen_initial_domain() in addition to the kernel side book-keeping side of
things (set chip and handler, update irq_info etc) whereas
xen_allocate_pirq_msi just does the kernel book keeping.
Also xen_allocate_pirq allocates an IRQ in the 1-1 GSI space whereas
xen_allocate_pirq_msi allocates a dynamic one in the >GSI IRQ space.
All of this is uneccessary as this code path is only executed
when we run as a domU PV guest with an MSI/MSI-X PCI card passed in.
Hence we can jump straight to allocating an dynamic IRQ (and
binding it to the proper PIRQ) and skip the rest.
In short: this change is a cosmetic one.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
---
arch/x86/pci/xen.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
index 25cd4a0..6432f75 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
@@ -157,14 +157,14 @@ static int xen_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
goto error;
i = 0;
list_for_each_entry(msidesc, &dev->msi_list, list) {
- irq = xen_allocate_pirq(v[i], 0, /* not sharable */
+ xen_allocate_pirq_msi(
(type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX) ?
- "pcifront-msi-x" : "pcifront-msi");
+ "pcifront-msi-x" : "pcifront-msi",
+ &irq, &v[i], XEN_ALLOC_IRQ);
if (irq < 0) {
ret = -1;
goto free;
}
-
ret = set_irq_msi(irq, msidesc);
if (ret)
goto error_while;
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-18 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-16 22:17 [PATCH] Xen PCI fronted fixes for 2.6.39 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-16 22:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] pci/xen: Use xen_allocate_pirq_msi Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-17 8:41 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-02-17 14:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-18 14:07 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-02-18 14:11 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-18 14:13 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-02-17 14:52 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-16 22:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] xen-pcifront: Sanity check the MSI/MSI-X values Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-17 8:53 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-02-18 14:08 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-18 14:15 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-18 14:20 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-16 22:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] xen-pcifront: don't use flush_scheduled_work() Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-17 8:29 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Xen PCI fronted fixes for 2.6.39 Ian Campbell
2011-02-17 14:28 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-17 14:38 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-18 14:22 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110218140729.GA8446@dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=konrad@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox