From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@vmware.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, geert@linux-m68k.org,
linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>,
Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module versions
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 23:02:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110222070240.GA21765@dtor-ws.eng.vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimyaA+JdBHekm69R5Y2A2DEdPdndFLrKJAaz=vt@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 06:03:16PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> >
> > The only sane thing I can see is make sure that such structures that
> > we put into sections "arrays" like that are naturally aligned with
> > padding.
>
> The sad part is, that assuming I read the gcc sources correctly (see
> the earlier emails where David pointed to it), that alignment is:
> - architecture-specific
> - depends on the size of the structure
> - seems to depend on the version of gcc itself.
>
> The _one_ safe case is likely to be "structure size is a power of
> two". And it does look like using a pointer is going to be safe, not
> only because the gcc auto-alignment only triggers for things like
> structs/unions/arrays, but because at least the x86 code only does it
> if the structure was bigger than the alignment size itself.
>
> So using pointer indirection is likely to be safe. It's still ugly and
> annoying as heck, though.
>
Regardless the approach we'll take I think the following patch is also
needed (for cris architecture). I am not sure why __param section is
inly defined for one specific subarch but I they need __param they'll
need __modev as well.
Thanks,
Dmitry
>From a567280f900c15891a55e7ea4e2919b38e1d1a01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@vmware.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:12:26 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] cris: add missing __modver section
Commit e94965ed5beb23c6fabf7ed31f625e66d7ff28de added a new __modver
section to store module version information for drivers built into the
kernel, but missed the fact that cris does some additional steps to
set up sections.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@vmware.com>
---
arch/cris/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 4 ++++
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/cris/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/cris/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
index 4422189..fae1b7b 100644
--- a/arch/cris/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
+++ b/arch/cris/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
@@ -73,6 +73,10 @@ SECTIONS
.init.data : { INIT_DATA }
.init.setup : { INIT_SETUP(16) }
#ifdef CONFIG_ETRAX_ARCH_V32
+ __start___modver = .;
+ __modver : { *(__modver) }
+ __stop___modver = .;
+
__start___param = .;
__param : { *(__param) }
__stop___param = .;
--
1.7.3.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-22 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-08 0:02 [PATCH 1/3] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module versions Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-08 0:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module parameters Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-08 0:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] module: do not hide __modver_version_show declaration behind ifdef Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-08 21:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module versions Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-02-17 12:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-02-11 22:03 ` [PATCH v2] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module parameters Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-13 23:04 ` Rusty Russell
2011-02-17 17:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module versions Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 17:31 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-17 17:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 18:00 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-17 18:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 21:01 ` David Miller
2011-02-17 21:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 21:17 ` David Miller
2011-02-17 21:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 22:01 ` David Miller
2011-02-17 22:19 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-17 22:23 ` David Miller
2011-02-17 22:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 23:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 23:19 ` David Miller
2011-02-19 0:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-02-21 4:00 ` Rusty Russell
2011-02-21 7:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-02-21 7:49 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-21 13:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-02-22 1:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-02-22 2:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-22 7:02 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2011-02-22 17:08 ` Jesper Nilsson
2011-02-22 20:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-23 15:00 ` Jesper Nilsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110222070240.GA21765@dtor-ws.eng.vmware.com \
--to=dtor@vmware.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=jesper.nilsson@axis.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=starvik@axis.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox