From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debug rcu head support !PREEMPT config
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:49:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110223174902.GN2163@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BLU0-SMTP900C4ABCF4001FBCB1594696DB0@phx.gbl>
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:13:19AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Remove DEBUG_RCU_HEAD dependency on PREEMPT config. Handle the unability to
> detect if within a RCU read-side critical section by never performing any
> attempt to recover from a failure situation in the fixup handlers. Just print
> the warnings.
>
> This patch is only compile-tested.
Queued with mods due to skew, thank you Mathieu!
Thanx, Paul
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> ---
> kernel/rcupdate.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> lib/Kconfig.debug | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/lib/Kconfig.debug
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ config DEBUG_OBJECTS_WORK
>
> config DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD
> bool "Debug RCU callbacks objects"
> - depends on DEBUG_OBJECTS && PREEMPT
> + depends on DEBUG_OBJECTS
> help
> Enable this to turn on debugging of RCU list heads (call_rcu() usage).
>
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/rcupdate.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/kernel/rcupdate.c
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/rcupdate.c
> @@ -142,7 +142,14 @@ static int rcuhead_fixup_init(void *addr
> * Ensure that queued callbacks are all executed.
> * If we detect that we are nested in a RCU read-side critical
> * section, we should simply fail, otherwise we would deadlock.
> + * In !PREEMPT configurations, there is no way to tell if we are
> + * in a RCU read-side critical section or not, so we never
> + * attempt any fixup and just print a warning.
> */
> +#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + return 0;
> +#endif
> if (rcu_preempt_depth() != 0 || preempt_count() != 0 ||
> irqs_disabled()) {
> WARN_ON(1);
> @@ -184,7 +191,14 @@ static int rcuhead_fixup_activate(void *
> * Ensure that queued callbacks are all executed.
> * If we detect that we are nested in a RCU read-side critical
> * section, we should simply fail, otherwise we would deadlock.
> + * In !PREEMPT configurations, there is no way to tell if we are
> + * in a RCU read-side critical section or not, so we never
> + * attempt any fixup and just print a warning.
> */
> +#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + return 0;
> +#endif
> if (rcu_preempt_depth() != 0 || preempt_count() != 0 ||
> irqs_disabled()) {
> WARN_ON(1);
> @@ -214,6 +228,9 @@ static int rcuhead_fixup_free(void *addr
> * Ensure that queued callbacks are all executed.
> * If we detect that we are nested in a RCU read-side critical
> * section, we should simply fail, otherwise we would deadlock.
> + * In !PREEMPT configurations, there is no way to tell if we are
> + * in a RCU read-side critical section or not, so we never
> + * attempt any fixup and just print a warning.
> */
> #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> WARN_ON(1);
> --
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
> EfficiOS Inc.
> http://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-23 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-23 1:39 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/14] Preview of RCU patches for 2.6.39 Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 1:39 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/11] rcu: call __rcu_read_unlock() in exit_rcu for tiny RCU Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-25 8:29 ` Lai Jiangshan
2011-02-25 19:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-03-24 3:45 ` Lai Jiangshan
2011-03-24 13:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-03-25 2:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 1:39 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/11] rcutorture: Get rid of duplicate sched.h include Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 1:39 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 03/11] rcu: add documentation saying which RCU flavor to choose Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 1:39 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 04/11] rcupdate: remove dead code Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 14:36 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-23 1:39 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 05/11] rcu: add comment saying why DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD depends on PREEMPT Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 3:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-23 13:59 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <BLU0-SMTP615CB0BE0A2623EF62925096DB0@phx.gbl>
2011-02-23 14:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-23 14:37 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-23 14:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-23 15:02 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-23 15:13 ` [PATCH] debug rcu head support !PREEMPT config Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <BLU0-SMTP1519908E0ACAEE1384F71896DB0@phx.gbl>
2011-02-23 15:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-23 15:37 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <BLU0-SMTP42770DC9BDE561B962274096DB0@phx.gbl>
2011-02-23 18:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 18:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <BLU0-SMTP900C4ABCF4001FBCB1594696DB0@phx.gbl>
2011-02-23 17:49 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-02-23 1:39 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 06/11] smp: Document transitivity for memory barriers Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 3:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-23 6:21 ` Lai Jiangshan
2011-02-23 15:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 1:39 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 07/11] rcu: Remove conditional compilation for RCU CPU stall warnings Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 1:39 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 08/11] rcu: Decrease memory-barrier usage based on semi-formal proof Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 1:39 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 09/11] rcu: merge TREE_PREEPT_RCU blocked_tasks[] lists Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 1:39 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 10/11] rcu: Update documentation to reflect blocked_tasks[] merge Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 1:39 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/11] rcu: move TREE_RCU from softirq to kthread Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 2:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-02-23 15:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 3:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-02-23 15:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 14:02 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <BLU0-SMTP211F39903EDACD9B7E025C96DB0@phx.gbl>
2011-02-23 14:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-23 16:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-02-23 16:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-23 17:03 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-23 17:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
[not found] ` <BLU0-SMTP5642728A153E83B94895F896DB0@phx.gbl>
2011-02-23 17:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
[not found] ` <BLU0-SMTP65F733B8D1D704C7EA1F8796DB0@phx.gbl>
2011-02-23 17:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-02-23 18:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-23 18:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-02-23 18:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-23 19:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-02-23 19:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-23 19:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-23 19:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-02-23 20:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 19:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 19:24 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-02-23 20:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 18:38 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-23 18:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-23 19:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 19:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-02-23 19:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 16:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-02-23 19:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 19:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-02-23 20:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
[not found] ` <BLU0-SMTP57EE20F30B92B8763FD2FE96DB0@phx.gbl>
2011-02-23 18:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-25 8:17 ` Lai Jiangshan
2011-02-25 20:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-28 3:29 ` Lai Jiangshan
2011-02-28 9:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-01 0:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-03-01 14:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 0:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-03-02 22:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-28 23:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-03-02 1:52 ` Lai Jiangshan
2011-02-23 1:39 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/14] rcu: priority boosting for TREE_PREEMPT_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 1:39 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 13/14] rcu: eliminate unused boosting statistics Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 1:39 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu: Add boosting to TREE_PREEMPT_RCU tracing Paul E. McKenney
2011-02-23 3:07 ` Lai Jiangshan
2011-02-23 16:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110223174902.GN2163@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox