From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756057Ab1BXJjm (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Feb 2011 04:39:42 -0500 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:36857 "EHLO opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751987Ab1BXJjl (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Feb 2011 04:39:41 -0500 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:39:39 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Alberto Panizzo Cc: Jesper Juhl , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood , Yong Shen , Sascha Hauer Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator, mc13xxx: Remove pointless test for unsigned less than zero Message-ID: <20110224093939.GH8226@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1298538787.2454.24.camel@realization> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1298538787.2454.24.camel@realization> X-Cookie: You will contract a rare disease. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:13:07AM +0100, Alberto Panizzo wrote: > Ok for me, but the next time give also the revision of the kernel > your patch is based on (Linus one, Liam one ..) that is the > linus-2.6.38-rc6 There is no need to do this for normal kernel submissions, it should be obvious where the patch is going (either Linus' tree for urgent enough fixes or whatever's in -next for the most part).