From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [cpuops cmpxchg double V3 4/5] Lockless (and preemptless) fastpaths for slub
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:56:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110225205624.GA24988@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1102251444330.7359@router.home>
* Christoph Lameter (cl@linux.com) wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> > > Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/slub_def.h
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/slub_def.h 2011-02-25 10:45:49.000000000 -0600
> > > +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/slub_def.h 2011-02-25 10:46:19.000000000 -0600
> > > @@ -35,7 +35,10 @@ enum stat_item {
> > > NR_SLUB_STAT_ITEMS };
> > >
> > > struct kmem_cache_cpu {
> > > - void **freelist; /* Pointer to first free per cpu object */
> > > + void **freelist; /* Pointer to next available object */
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_CMPXCHG_LOCAL
> > > + unsigned long tid; /* Globally unique transaction id */
> > > +#endif
> >
> > There seem to be no strong guarantee that freelist is double-word aligned here.
>
> The struct kmem_cache_cpu allocation via alloc_percpu() specifies double
> word alignment. See the remainder of the code quoted by you:
So adding a comment on top of struct kmem_cache_cpu declaration might be
appropriate too, just in case it is ever defined elsewhere.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_CMPXCHG_LOCAL
> > > + /*
> > > + * Must align to double word boundary for the double cmpxchg instructions
> > > + * to work.
> > > + */
> > > + s->cpu_slab = __alloc_percpu(sizeof(struct kmem_cache_cpu), 2 * sizeof(void *));
> > > +#else
> > > + /* Regular alignment is sufficient */
> > > s->cpu_slab = alloc_percpu(struct kmem_cache_cpu);
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > + if (!s->cpu_slab)
> > > + return 0;
> > >
> > > - return s->cpu_slab != NULL;
> > > + init_kmem_cache_cpus(s);
> > > +
> > > + return 1;
> > > }
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-25 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-25 17:38 [cpuops cmpxchg double V3 0/5] this_cpu_cmpxchg_double support Christoph Lameter
2011-02-25 17:38 ` [cpuops cmpxchg double V3 1/5] slub: min_partial needs to be in first cacheline Christoph Lameter
2011-02-25 17:38 ` [cpuops cmpxchg double V3 2/5] slub: Get rid of slab_free_hook_irq() Christoph Lameter
2011-02-25 18:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-25 17:38 ` [cpuops cmpxchg double V3 3/5] Generic support for this_cpu_cmpxchg_double Christoph Lameter
2011-02-25 18:25 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-25 20:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-25 20:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-02-25 20:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-25 20:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-02-25 21:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-28 10:22 ` [PATCH] percpu: Generic support for this_cpu_cmpxchg_double() this_cpu_cmpxchg_double Tejun Heo
2011-02-25 17:38 ` [cpuops cmpxchg double V3 4/5] Lockless (and preemptless) fastpaths for slub Christoph Lameter
2011-02-25 18:21 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-25 20:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-02-25 20:56 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2011-02-25 17:38 ` [cpuops cmpxchg double V3 5/5] x86: this_cpu_cmpxchg_double() support Christoph Lameter
2011-02-28 10:23 ` [PATCH] percpu, x86: Add arch-specific " Tejun Heo
2011-02-28 10:36 ` [cpuops cmpxchg double V3 0/5] this_cpu_cmpxchg_double support Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110225205624.GA24988@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox