From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@nokia.com>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>,
"Anton Vorontsov" <cbouatmailru@gmail.com>,
"Rodolfo Giometti" <giometti@linux.it>,
"Grazvydas Ignotas" <notasas@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bq27x00: New property POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_MAX
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 08:35:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110301063519.GA28708@esdhcp034230> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D6BA118.9090304@metafoo.de>
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 02:20:24PM +0100, ext Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 02/27/2011 01:02 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > This patch add support for reporting property POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_MAX
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
> >
> > --- a/drivers/power/bq27x00_battery.c 2011-02-27 12:14:56.000000000 +0100
> > +++ b/drivers/power/bq27x00_battery.c 2011-02-27 12:55:33.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> > * Copyright (C) 2008 Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@linux.it>
> > * Copyright (C) 2008 Eurotech S.p.A. <info@eurotech.it>
> > * Copyright (C) 2010-2011 Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
> > + * Copyright (C) 2011 Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
> > *
> > * Based on a previous work by Copyright (C) 2008 Texas Instruments, Inc.
> > *
> > @@ -53,11 +54,13 @@
> >
> > #define BQ27000_REG_RSOC 0x0B /* Relative State-of-Charge */
> > #define BQ27000_REG_ILMD 0x76 /* Initial last measured discharge */
> > +#define BQ27000_REG_IMLC 0x7D /* Initial max load current */
> > #define BQ27000_FLAG_CHGS BIT(7)
> > #define BQ27000_FLAG_FC BIT(5)
> >
> > #define BQ27500_REG_SOC 0x2C
> > #define BQ27500_REG_DCAP 0x3C /* Design capacity */
> > +#define BQ27500_REG_MLI 0x1E /* Max load current */
> > #define BQ27500_FLAG_DSC BIT(0)
> > #define BQ27500_FLAG_FC BIT(9)
> >
> > @@ -90,6 +93,7 @@ struct bq27x00_device_info {
> >
> > struct bq27x00_reg_cache cache;
> > int charge_design_full;
> > + int current_max;
> >
> > unsigned long last_update;
> > struct delayed_work work;
> > @@ -106,6 +110,7 @@ static enum power_supply_property bq27x0
> > POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_PRESENT,
> > POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_NOW,
> > POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_NOW,
> > + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_MAX,
> > POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CAPACITY,
> > POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TEMP,
> > POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TIME_TO_EMPTY_NOW,
> > @@ -220,6 +225,32 @@ static int bq27x00_battery_read_ilmd(str
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > + * Return the battery Initial max load current in µA
> > + * Or < 0 if something fails.
> > + */
> > +static int bq27x00_battery_read_imlc(struct bq27x00_device_info *di)
> > +{
> > + int imlc;
> > +
> > + if (di->chip == BQ27500)
> > + imlc = bq27x00_read(di, BQ27500_REG_MLI, false);
> > + else
> > + imlc = bq27x00_read(di, BQ27000_REG_IMLC, true);
> > +
>
> According to the datasheet the MLI register contains an adaptive value which is
> averaged each time the battery has been fully charged after previously being
> discharged to less then 50%.
> The IMLC register holds some preprogrammed value and is used to initialize the
> MLI register upon a battery reset.
> So with the current implementation you'll get different results for
> bq27000/bq27200 and bq27500.
>
> Furthermore I'm not sure if the CURRENT_MAX property actually makes sense in
> the context of a battery.
> There is no entry for the CURRENT_MAX property in
> Documentation/power/power_supply. But according to the commit message of the
> commit adding that property I would assume that it is supposed to be used for
> chargers to indicate the maximum current that can be drawn from it. (Adding the
> author of that commit to Cc).
Yes, the CURRENT_MAX property was meant for suppliers that it's
_supplicants_, batteries, can use. I guess this needs to be added to
Documentation/power/power_supply_class.txt.
So I agree. It does not seem to make much sense to use it here.
--
heikki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-01 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-27 12:02 [PATCH] bq27x00: New property POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_MAX Pali Rohár
2011-02-28 13:20 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-03-01 6:35 ` Heikki Krogerus [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110301063519.GA28708@esdhcp034230 \
--to=heikki.krogerus@nokia.com \
--cc=cbouatmailru@gmail.com \
--cc=giometti@linux.it \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=notasas@gmail.com \
--cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox