From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756582Ab1CBJ65 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2011 04:58:57 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:60687 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756432Ab1CBJ6z (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2011 04:58:55 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 10:58:47 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vincent Guittot , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, amit.kucheria@linaro.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 2/2] tracing, perf: add cpu hotplug trace events Message-ID: <20110302095847.GA24111@elte.hu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 2 Mar 2011, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > > On 2 March 2011 10:38, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > > > > >> Trace the cpu state and the time spent in core and arch code > > > > > > So you completely ignored my review comments, except for fixing up the > > > changelog. > > > > > >        https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/24/297 > > > > > > All of the comments in the code still apply and either you fix it or > > > at least have the courtesy to explain why you think that those > > > comments do not need to be addressed. > > > > > > > I thought that I have answered to your comments : > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/28/203 > > > > Do I miss something ? > > Oops, my bad. I missed that reply somehow. It's not in my inbox. Will > dig into my lkml archive then. Hm, same here, i only got that reply from lkml, never via direct mail delivery. So something ate the straight path of that mail. Thanks, Ingo