From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757247Ab1CBK7I (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 2 Mar 2011 05:59:08 -0500
Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:35529 "EHLO
	mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1757046Ab1CBK7F (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 2 Mar 2011 05:59:05 -0500
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
         :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
        b=P/eKMYE0i51Tr6I2NBiE1kWsiu2eyQ1fOMXT6svoz3bs8k4nHT9pkIM+z+tg/4ARjL
         FnKIryGMsTPQYzDO9cHZ4yj0LQRMw0/Ru9RVeR0nsXpm0QqIlJb5loZKuzUcy+v3iqUR
         0KTzm+MDjDcjyLb5ZHXWjXq8wbW9qgiQQObL4=
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 11:59:02 +0100
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
        tglx@linutronix.de, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH x86/mm] x86-64, NUMA: Fix distance table handling
Message-ID: <20110302105902.GF3319@htj.dyndns.org>
References: <20110224145128.GM7840@htj.dyndns.org>
 <4D66AC9C.6080500@kernel.org>
 <20110224192305.GB15498@elte.hu>
 <4D66B176.9030300@kernel.org>
 <alpine.DEB.2.00.1103010844430.19743@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
 <20110302100400.GK19669@htj.dyndns.org>
 <20110302104336.GA26381@elte.hu>
 <20110302105325.GE3319@htj.dyndns.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110302105325.GE3319@htj.dyndns.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 11:53:25AM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Yeah, this one was on the boundary for me.  I felt that I edited too
> much of the original patch to leave Yinghai's From and S-O-B.  Please
> don't take it wrong.  I wasn't trying to emphasize my editing but
> wasn't sure whether the chain of custody can be maintained after such
> edit.  Maybe I should just ask for respin, with which I haven't had a
> lot of luck lately.  Eh well, I'll just change it this time.

Alright, updated in the git tree.  I'll send pull request in a few
hours.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun