From: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: t.artem@mailcity.com,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: MS_SILENT vs. vfat and hfs
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 12:45:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110302114517.GA496@nb.net.home> (raw)
The mount(8) command uses "quiet" mount option as a synonym to the
MS_SILENT mount flag (since util-linux 2.7, Aug 1997).
It means than on systems where is properly defined the MS_SILENT
mount flags in headers is the "quiet" mount option always translated
to the MS_SILENT mount flags and "quiet" string is never send to FS
drivers.
$ strace -e mount mount -o quiet /dev/sdb1 /mnt/test
mount("/dev/sdb1", "/mnt/test", "vfat", MS_MGC_VAL|MS_SILENT, NULL) = 0
^^^^^^^^^
Unfortunately,
$ grep -r \"quiet\" *
fat/inode.c: {Opt_quiet, "quiet"},
hfs/super.c: { opt_quiet, "quiet" },
vfat and hfs drivers use "quiet" as a mount option. That's bug.
There should not be a collision between mount(8) mount options and
filesystem specific mount options.
My suggestion is to fix the fat and hfs code to use something other
than "quiet" (shutup, noisless, ...). I think you don't have to care
about backward compatibility, because it's probably broken for years.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
next reply other threads:[~2011-03-02 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-02 11:45 Karel Zak [this message]
2011-03-02 14:14 ` MS_SILENT vs. vfat and hfs OGAWA Hirofumi
2011-03-02 14:43 ` Karel Zak
2011-03-02 15:06 ` Karel Zak
2011-03-02 15:16 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2011-03-02 15:13 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110302114517.GA496@nb.net.home \
--to=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=t.artem@mailcity.com \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox