From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [PATCH 02/22] sched: Always provide p->on_cpu
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 18:38:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110302174120.384811493@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110302173831.295031866@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: sched-on_cpu.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3731 bytes --]
Always provide p->on_cpu so that we can determine if its on a cpu
without having to lock the rq.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 4 +---
kernel/sched.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -845,18 +845,39 @@ static inline int task_current(struct rq
return rq->curr == p;
}
-#ifndef __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW
static inline int task_running(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ return p->on_cpu;
+#else
return task_current(rq, p);
+#endif
}
+#ifndef __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW
static inline void prepare_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ /*
+ * We can optimise this out completely for !SMP, because the
+ * SMP rebalancing from interrupt is the only thing that cares
+ * here.
+ */
+ next->on_cpu = 1;
+#endif
}
static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ /*
+ * After ->on_cpu is cleared, the task can be moved to a different CPU.
+ * We must ensure this doesn't happen until the switch is completely
+ * finished.
+ */
+ smp_wmb();
+ prev->on_cpu = 0;
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
/* this is a valid case when another task releases the spinlock */
rq->lock.owner = current;
@@ -872,15 +893,6 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(st
}
#else /* __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW */
-static inline int task_running(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- return p->oncpu;
-#else
- return task_current(rq, p);
-#endif
-}
-
static inline void prepare_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -889,7 +901,7 @@ static inline void prepare_lock_switch(s
* SMP rebalancing from interrupt is the only thing that cares
* here.
*/
- next->oncpu = 1;
+ next->on_cpu = 1;
#endif
#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
@@ -902,12 +914,12 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(st
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
- * After ->oncpu is cleared, the task can be moved to a different CPU.
+ * After ->on_cpu is cleared, the task can be moved to a different CPU.
* We must ensure this doesn't happen until the switch is completely
* finished.
*/
smp_wmb();
- prev->oncpu = 0;
+ prev->on_cpu = 0;
#endif
#ifndef __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW
local_irq_enable();
@@ -2645,8 +2657,8 @@ void sched_fork(struct task_struct *p, i
if (likely(sched_info_on()))
memset(&p->sched_info, 0, sizeof(p->sched_info));
#endif
-#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(__ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW)
- p->oncpu = 0;
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
+ p->on_cpu = 0;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
/* Want to start with kernel preemption disabled. */
@@ -5557,8 +5569,8 @@ void __cpuinit init_idle(struct task_str
rcu_read_unlock();
rq->curr = rq->idle = idle;
-#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(__ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW)
- idle->oncpu = 1;
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
+ idle->on_cpu = 1;
#endif
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1198,9 +1198,7 @@ struct task_struct {
int lock_depth; /* BKL lock depth */
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW
- int oncpu;
-#endif
+ int on_cpu;
#endif
int prio, static_prio, normal_prio;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-02 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-02 17:38 [PATCH 00/22] sched: Reduce runqueue lock contention -v5 Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 01/22] sched: Provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to smp_send_reschedule() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-11 1:36 ` Frank Rowand
2011-03-16 8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-11 15:07 ` [01/22] " Milton Miller
2011-03-11 15:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-15 3:59 ` Milton Miller
2011-03-15 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 03/22] mutex: Use p->on_cpu for the adaptive spin Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 04/22] sched: Change the ttwu success details Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 05/22] sched: Clean up ttwu stats Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 06/22] sched: Provide p->on_rq Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 07/22] sched: Serialize p->cpus_allowed and ttwu() using p->pi_lock Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 08/22] sched: Drop the rq argument to sched_class::select_task_rq() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 09/22] sched: Remove rq argument to sched_class::task_waking() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 10/22] sched: Deal with non-atomic min_vruntime reads on 32bits Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 11/22] sched: Delay task_contributes_to_load() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 12/22] sched: Also serialize ttwu_local() with p->pi_lock Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 13/22] sched: Add p->pi_lock to task_rq_lock() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 14/22] sched: Drop rq->lock from first part of wake_up_new_task() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 15/22] sched: Drop rq->lock from sched_exec() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 16/22] sched: Remove rq->lock from the first half of ttwu() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 17/22] sched: Remove rq argument from ttwu_stat() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 18/22] sched: Rename ttwu_post_activation Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 19/22] sched: Restructure ttwu some more Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 20/22] sched: Move the second half of ttwu() to the remote cpu Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-11 1:44 ` Frank Rowand
2011-03-16 8:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 21/22] sched: Remove need_migrate_task() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 22/22] sched: Remove TASK_WAKING Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-11 1:49 ` Frank Rowand
2011-03-16 9:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-11 1:51 ` [PATCH 00/22] sched: Reduce runqueue lock contention -v5 Frank Rowand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110302174120.384811493@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox