public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [PATCH 16/22] sched: Remove rq->lock from the first half of ttwu()
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 18:38:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110302174121.416303544@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110302173831.295031866@chello.nl

[-- Attachment #1: sched-ttwu-optimize.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3781 bytes --]

Currently ttwu() does two rq->lock acquisitions, once on the task's
old rq, holding it over the p->state fiddling and load-balance pass.
Then it drops the old rq->lock to acquire the new rq->lock.

By having serialized ttwu(), p->sched_class, p->cpus_allowed with
p->pi_lock, we can now drop the whole first rq->lock acquisition.

The p->pi_lock serializing concurrent ttwu() calls protects p->state,
which we will set to TASK_WAKING to bridge possible p->pi_lock to
rq->lock gaps and serialize set_task_cpu() calls against
task_rq_lock().

The p->pi_lock serialization of p->sched_class allows us to call
scheduling class methods without holding the rq->lock, and the
serialization of p->cpus_allowed allows us to do the load-balancing
bits without races.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
---
 kernel/sched.c |   63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2486,69 +2486,76 @@ ttwu_post_activation(struct task_struct 
  * Returns %true if @p was woken up, %false if it was already running
  * or @state didn't match @p's state.
  */
-static int try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state,
-			  int wake_flags)
+static int
+try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
 {
-	int cpu, orig_cpu, this_cpu, success = 0;
+	int cpu, this_cpu, success = 0;
 	unsigned long flags;
-	unsigned long en_flags = ENQUEUE_WAKEUP;
 	struct rq *rq;
 
 	this_cpu = get_cpu();
 
 	smp_wmb();
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
-	rq = __task_rq_lock(p);
 	if (!(p->state & state))
 		goto out;
 
 	cpu = task_cpu(p);
 
-	if (p->on_rq)
-		goto out_running;
+	if (p->on_rq) {
+		rq = __task_rq_lock(p);
+		if (p->on_rq)
+			goto out_running;
+		__task_rq_unlock(rq);
+	}
 
-	orig_cpu = cpu;
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-	if (unlikely(task_running(rq, p)))
-		goto out_activate;
+	while (p->on_cpu) {
+#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW
+		/*
+		 * If called from interrupt context we could have landed in the
+		 * middle of schedule(), in this case we should take care not
+		 * to spin on ->on_cpu if p is current, since that would
+		 * deadlock.
+		 */
+		if (p == current)
+			goto out_activate;
+#endif
+		cpu_relax();
+	}
+	/*
+	 * Pairs with the smp_wmb() in finish_lock_switch().
+	 */
+	smp_rmb();
 
 	p->sched_contributes_to_load = !!task_contributes_to_load(p);
 	p->state = TASK_WAKING;
 
-	if (p->sched_class->task_waking) {
+	if (p->sched_class->task_waking)
 		p->sched_class->task_waking(p);
-		en_flags |= ENQUEUE_WAKING;
-	}
 
 	cpu = select_task_rq(p, SD_BALANCE_WAKE, wake_flags);
-	if (cpu != orig_cpu)
-		set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
-	__task_rq_unlock(rq);
+out_activate:
+#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
 
 	rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
 	raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
 
-	/*
-	 * We migrated the task without holding either rq->lock, however
-	 * since the task is not on the task list itself, nobody else
-	 * will try and migrate the task, hence the rq should match the
-	 * cpu we just moved it to.
-	 */
-	WARN_ON(task_cpu(p) != cpu);
-	WARN_ON(p->state != TASK_WAKING);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+	if (cpu != task_cpu(p))
+		set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
 
 	if (p->sched_contributes_to_load)
 		rq->nr_uninterruptible--;
+#endif
 
-out_activate:
-#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
-	activate_task(rq, p, en_flags);
+	activate_task(rq, p, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP | ENQUEUE_WAKING);
 out_running:
 	ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, wake_flags);
 	ttwu_stat(rq, p, cpu, wake_flags);
 	success = 1;
-out:
 	__task_rq_unlock(rq);
+out:
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
 	put_cpu();
 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-03-02 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-02 17:38 [PATCH 00/22] sched: Reduce runqueue lock contention -v5 Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 01/22] sched: Provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to smp_send_reschedule() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-11  1:36   ` Frank Rowand
2011-03-16  8:30     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-11 15:07   ` [01/22] " Milton Miller
2011-03-11 15:27     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-15  3:59       ` Milton Miller
2011-03-15  9:13         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 02/22] sched: Always provide p->on_cpu Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 03/22] mutex: Use p->on_cpu for the adaptive spin Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 04/22] sched: Change the ttwu success details Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 05/22] sched: Clean up ttwu stats Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 06/22] sched: Provide p->on_rq Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 07/22] sched: Serialize p->cpus_allowed and ttwu() using p->pi_lock Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 08/22] sched: Drop the rq argument to sched_class::select_task_rq() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 09/22] sched: Remove rq argument to sched_class::task_waking() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 10/22] sched: Deal with non-atomic min_vruntime reads on 32bits Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 11/22] sched: Delay task_contributes_to_load() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 12/22] sched: Also serialize ttwu_local() with p->pi_lock Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 13/22] sched: Add p->pi_lock to task_rq_lock() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 14/22] sched: Drop rq->lock from first part of wake_up_new_task() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 15/22] sched: Drop rq->lock from sched_exec() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 17/22] sched: Remove rq argument from ttwu_stat() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 18/22] sched: Rename ttwu_post_activation Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 19/22] sched: Restructure ttwu some more Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 20/22] sched: Move the second half of ttwu() to the remote cpu Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-11  1:44   ` Frank Rowand
2011-03-16  8:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 21/22] sched: Remove need_migrate_task() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 22/22] sched: Remove TASK_WAKING Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-11  1:49   ` Frank Rowand
2011-03-16  9:53     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-11  1:51 ` [PATCH 00/22] sched: Reduce runqueue lock contention -v5 Frank Rowand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110302174121.416303544@chello.nl \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox