public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [PATCH 21/22] sched: Remove need_migrate_task()
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 18:38:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110302174121.784558435@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110302173831.295031866@chello.nl

[-- Attachment #1: sched-opt-need_migrate_task.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1569 bytes --]

Oleg noticed that need_migrate_task() doesn't need the ->on_cpu check
now that ttwu() doesn't do remote enqueues for !->on_rq && ->on_cpu,
so remove the helper and replace the single instance with a direct
->on_rq test.

Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
---
 kernel/sched.c |   17 +----------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2139,21 +2139,6 @@ struct migration_arg {
 static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data);
 
 /*
- * The task's runqueue lock must be held.
- * Returns true if you have to wait for migration thread.
- */
-static bool need_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p)
-{
-	/*
-	 * If the task is not on a runqueue (and not running), then
-	 * the next wake-up will properly place the task.
-	 */
-	bool running = p->on_rq || p->on_cpu;
-	smp_rmb(); /* finish_lock_switch() */
-	return running;
-}
-
-/*
  * wait_task_inactive - wait for a thread to unschedule.
  *
  * If @match_state is nonzero, it's the @p->state value just checked and
@@ -5734,7 +5719,7 @@ int set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_str
 		goto out;
 
 	dest_cpu = cpumask_any_and(cpu_active_mask, new_mask);
-	if (need_migrate_task(p)) {
+	if (p->on_rq) {
 		struct migration_arg arg = { p, dest_cpu };
 		/* Need help from migration thread: drop lock and wait. */
 		task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &flags);



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-03-02 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-02 17:38 [PATCH 00/22] sched: Reduce runqueue lock contention -v5 Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 01/22] sched: Provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to smp_send_reschedule() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-11  1:36   ` Frank Rowand
2011-03-16  8:30     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-11 15:07   ` [01/22] " Milton Miller
2011-03-11 15:27     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-15  3:59       ` Milton Miller
2011-03-15  9:13         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 02/22] sched: Always provide p->on_cpu Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 03/22] mutex: Use p->on_cpu for the adaptive spin Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 04/22] sched: Change the ttwu success details Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 05/22] sched: Clean up ttwu stats Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 06/22] sched: Provide p->on_rq Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 07/22] sched: Serialize p->cpus_allowed and ttwu() using p->pi_lock Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 08/22] sched: Drop the rq argument to sched_class::select_task_rq() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 09/22] sched: Remove rq argument to sched_class::task_waking() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 10/22] sched: Deal with non-atomic min_vruntime reads on 32bits Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 11/22] sched: Delay task_contributes_to_load() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 12/22] sched: Also serialize ttwu_local() with p->pi_lock Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 13/22] sched: Add p->pi_lock to task_rq_lock() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 14/22] sched: Drop rq->lock from first part of wake_up_new_task() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 15/22] sched: Drop rq->lock from sched_exec() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 16/22] sched: Remove rq->lock from the first half of ttwu() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 17/22] sched: Remove rq argument from ttwu_stat() Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 18/22] sched: Rename ttwu_post_activation Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 19/22] sched: Restructure ttwu some more Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 20/22] sched: Move the second half of ttwu() to the remote cpu Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-11  1:44   ` Frank Rowand
2011-03-16  8:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-02 17:38 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-03-02 17:38 ` [PATCH 22/22] sched: Remove TASK_WAKING Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-11  1:49   ` Frank Rowand
2011-03-16  9:53     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-11  1:51 ` [PATCH 00/22] sched: Reduce runqueue lock contention -v5 Frank Rowand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110302174121.784558435@chello.nl \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox