From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Reverting NUMA-affine page table allocation
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 19:32:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110302183200.GF13693@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110302181941.GD13693@elte.hu>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>
> > On 03/02/2011 10:08 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > >> To me, it seems complicated for not good enough reasons. I'll defer
> > >> the decision to x86 maintainers. Ingo, hpa, Thomas, what do you guys
> > >> think?
> > >
> > > Would be nice to see an actual patch that does the revert.
> > >
> >
> > I also would like to point out that we are at -rc7. The time to test
> > new things is quickly running out, so a more conservative option for
> > this upcoming merge window is starting to look good.
>
> Hm, i thought the revert was for tip:x86/mm, not x86/urgent. [...]
On a second reading you suggested the same, so please ignore my mail! :-)
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-02 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-26 14:37 [RFC] Reverting NUMA-affine page table allocation Tejun Heo
2011-03-01 8:30 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-01 22:41 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 16:19 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 16:47 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 17:07 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 18:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-02 18:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-03-02 18:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-02 18:25 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 18:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-02 18:32 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-03-02 18:22 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110302183200.GF13693@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox