From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86: Work around old gas bug
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 21:35:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110302213553.88ec33cd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1299130025.19589.89.camel@sli10-conroe>
On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 13:27:05 +0800 Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 00:24 +0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 11:41:44 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >
> > > Meanwhile, what i hate more than ugly code repetition is code that does not build at
> > > all on akpm's test environment ;-)
> >
> > I hadn't got around to testing it. Bad news :(
> >
> Andrew,
> can you this on your side? this is what Jan proposed. I can only test a
> latest binutils here.
Nope.
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S: Assembler messages:
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-03 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201103012352.p21NqRN1006974@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
2011-03-02 8:42 ` [tip:x86/mm] x86: Work around old gas bug tip-bot for Shaohua Li
2011-03-02 10:35 ` Jan Beulich
2011-03-02 10:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-02 16:24 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-03 5:27 ` Shaohua Li
2011-03-03 5:35 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-03-03 9:24 ` Jan Beulich
2011-03-03 9:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-03 5:37 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-02 12:49 ` Shaohua Li
2011-03-03 10:55 [PATCH] x86: work around old gas bug (try 2) Jan Beulich
2011-03-03 11:52 ` [tip:x86/mm] x86: Work around old gas bug tip-bot for Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110302213553.88ec33cd.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox