From: Shawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@gmail.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, stable@kernel.org, lwn@lwn.net
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.32.30
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:24:03 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110302222403.GA7159@BohrerMBP.rgmadvisors.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110302204202.GB19022@suse.de>
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 03:42:02PM -0500, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 05:50:16PM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote:
> > > FUJITA Tomonori (1):
> > > swiotlb: fix wrong panic
> > >
> >
> > This one breaks compilation of 64bit for me as swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single() does
> > not exist. It does not look like it is a simple single patch that would get it
> > back to 2.6.32.
>
> I don't understand. Is this patch somehow broken? Is there an
> additional patch I need to apply to fix the build issue? I need more
> information here.
Same problem here, not sure what the fix is. With this patch applied
on 64-bit I get:
$ make lib/swiotlb.o
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-x86
HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
HOSTCC scripts/basic/docproc
HOSTCC scripts/basic/hash
CC kernel/bounds.s
GEN include/linux/bounds.h
CC arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s
GEN include/asm/asm-offsets.h
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
HOSTCC scripts/genksyms/genksyms.o
HOSTCC scripts/genksyms/lex.o
HOSTCC scripts/genksyms/parse.o
HOSTLD scripts/genksyms/genksyms
CC scripts/mod/empty.o
HOSTCC scripts/mod/mk_elfconfig
MKELF scripts/mod/elfconfig.h
HOSTCC scripts/mod/file2alias.o
HOSTCC scripts/mod/modpost.o
HOSTCC scripts/mod/sumversion.o
HOSTLD scripts/mod/modpost
HOSTCC scripts/kallsyms
HOSTCC scripts/pnmtologo
HOSTCC scripts/conmakehash
HOSTCC scripts/bin2c
CC lib/swiotlb.o
lib/swiotlb.c: In function 'swiotlb_map_page':
lib/swiotlb.c:635: error: implicit declaration of function 'swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single'
make[1]: *** [lib/swiotlb.o] Error 1
make: *** [lib/swiotlb.o] Error 2
--
Shawn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-02 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-02 14:58 Linux 2.6.32.30 Greg KH
2011-03-02 15:00 ` Greg KH
2011-03-02 16:50 ` Stefan Bader
2011-03-02 20:42 ` Greg KH
2011-03-02 22:17 ` Stefan Bader
2011-03-02 22:24 ` Shawn Bohrer [this message]
2011-03-02 22:29 ` David Engel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110302222403.GA7159@BohrerMBP.rgmadvisors.com \
--to=shawn.bohrer@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lwn@lwn.net \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=stefan.bader@canonical.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox