From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759627Ab1CDM4Z (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2011 07:56:25 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:56857 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759506Ab1CDM4X (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2011 07:56:23 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: Re: [PATCH, v8 1/3] hrtimer: introduce effective timer slack Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:55:21 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31-22-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Paul Menage , Li Zefan , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matt Helsley , Andrew Morton , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner References: <1299161947-9903-1-git-send-email-kirill@shutemov.name> <201103031732.28964.arnd@arndb.de> <20110304122035.GB14933@shutemov.name> In-Reply-To: <20110304122035.GB14933@shutemov.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201103041355.21740.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:0ji2WyF3ii5Gplmi76/Qc7IRua1loetvSfkf5YtqB62 BL8RHLT4bYmL3ZPBt3mFlMs2XuSMYW/XhKVvHcqwYHvNGxXQU4 bJqc+QrBXwC7QrD0U3yEOGGHp0aWd4NOj4fdtxQgbVIQKJNZg2 0SnfwLlL4a2nwtqTkDe8wPGwlPj9VAZSNlnOsotColx8S5ieVf h1C46aTokIrBRvMlHcBWg== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 04 March 2011, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > Does this make sense to you? > > Hm.. I think we can add this kind of functionality to timer slack cgroup > as a policy/stratagy later. I want to integrate basic functionality to > kernel first. Yes, makes sense. I wasn't objecting the current patch set, just trying to make sure that the other idea does not get lost, and we don't introduce anything now that prevents us from doing it later. Arnd