From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pidns: Make pid_max per namespace
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:58:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110307155823.22e47d73.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D6F53B5.5090105@parallels.com>
On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 11:39:17 +0300
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> wrote:
> Rationale:
>
> On x86_64 with big ram people running containers set pid_max on host to
> large values to be able to launch more containers. At the same time
> containers running 32-bit software experience problems with large pids - ps
> calls readdir/stat on proc entries and inode's i_ino happen to be too big
> for the 32-bit API.
>
> Thus, the ability to limit the pid value inside container is required.
>
This is a behavioural change, isn't it? In current kernels a write to
/proc/sys/kernel/pid_max will change the max pid on all processes.
After this change, that write will only affect processes in the current
namespace. Anyone who was depending on the old behaviour might run
into problems?
Also: documentation. Documentation/sysctl/kernel.txt would like an
update. And perhaps also the pidns documentation which we forgot to
create :(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-07 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-03 8:39 [PATCH] pidns: Make pid_max per namespace Pavel Emelyanov
2011-03-07 23:58 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-03-10 9:35 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2011-03-10 9:50 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-10 10:06 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2011-03-10 10:44 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110307155823.22e47d73.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox