From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: "gregkh@suse.de" <gregkh@suse.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
"virtualization@lists.osdl.org" <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] Staging: hv: Consolidate driver and device abstractions
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:00:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110307230014.GA9873@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6E21E5352C11B742B20C142EB499E0480173E9@TK5EX14MBXC128.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:45:15PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > I'm guessing that you will have follow-on patches now to complete the
> > migration to the correct driver core use (i.e. proper driver and device
> > usage?) Or do you want me to look into doing this?
>
> My immediate goal is to get the vmbus driver to exit staging. To that
> end I am working on a patch-set to cleanup vmbus_drv.c. I should have this
> patch-set fairly soon. Once that is
> done, I think we would have addressed all the structural/architectural issues
> of the vmbus driver that is preventing us from exiting staging.
Well, perhaps, let's not get ahead of ourselves here :)
> We are planning to address the issues with other drivers after we are done
> with the vmbus driver. As always, your help is greatly appreciated.
The issue I am referring to above still has to do with the vmbus core.
The goal is to have the vmbus work like all other busses in the kernel.
You register a hv_driver with some probe and disconnect callbacks, and
the vmbus calls into the drivers when it needs to.
You are almost there, using the struct device pointers directly, but a
few more steps remain.
I'll look into the details after your remaining cleanups, I don't want
to get in the way of them.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-07 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-07 21:01 [PATCH 00/16] Staging: hv: Consolidate driver and device abstractions K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-03-07 22:23 ` Greg KH
2011-03-07 22:45 ` KY Srinivasan
2011-03-07 23:00 ` Greg KH [this message]
2011-03-07 23:17 ` KY Srinivasan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-03-07 22:09 K. Y. Srinivasan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110307230014.GA9873@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox