From: "Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe" <Mario.Holbe@TU-Ilmenau.DE>
To: dm-crypt@saout.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com>, Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: dm-crypt: Performance Regression 2.6.37 -> 2.6.38-rc8
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 17:45:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110308164508.GA8729@darkside.kls.lan> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1268 bytes --]
Hello,
dm-crypt in 2.6.38 changed to per-CPU workqueues to increase it's
performance by parallelizing encryption to multiple CPUs.
This modification seems to cause (massive) performance drops for
multiple parallel dm-crypt instances...
I'm running a 4-disk RAID0 on top of 4 independent dm-crypt(aes-xts)
devices on a Core2Quad 3GHz. This setup did overcome the single-CPU
limitation from previous versions and utilized all 4 cores for
encryption.
The throughput of this array drops from 282MB/s sustained read (dd,
single process) with 2.6.37.3 down to 133MB/s with 2.6.38-rc8 (which
nearly equals to single-disk throughput of 128MB/s - just in case this
matters).
This indicates way less parallelization now with 2.6.38 than before.
I don't think this was intentional :)
The dm-crypt per-CPU workqueues got introduced in 2.6.38 with
c029772125594e31eb1a5ad9e0913724ed9891f2
Reverting dm-crypt.c to the version before this commit re-gains the same
throughput as with 2.6.37.
Submitters/Signers of c029772125594e31eb1a5ad9e0913724ed9891f2 CC:ed.
Thanks for your work & regards
Mario
--
There are two major products that come from Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
We don't believe this to be a coincidence. -- Jeremy S. Anderson
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 482 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2011-03-08 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-08 16:45 Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe [this message]
2011-03-08 17:35 ` [dm-crypt] dm-crypt: Performance Regression 2.6.37 -> 2.6.38-rc8 Milan Broz
2011-03-08 19:23 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2011-03-08 20:07 ` Milan Broz
2011-03-08 20:17 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2011-03-10 16:57 ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-10 17:54 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2011-03-11 1:18 ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-11 18:03 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2011-03-11 18:29 ` Milan Broz
2011-03-11 18:36 ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-12 1:05 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110308164508.GA8729@darkside.kls.lan \
--to=mario.holbe@tu-ilmenau.de \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dm-crypt@saout.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbroz@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox