From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hong Liu <hong.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RESEND] Putting the device into runtime suspend after resume()/probe() is handled
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 14:07:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110309140712.2500862d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110309215932.08183cfd@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 21:59:32 +0000
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 13:45:04 -0800
> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:39:34 +0000
> > Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> > > To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > Subject: [PATCH, RESEND] Putting the device into runtime suspend after resume()/probe() is handled
> > > Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:39:34 +0000
> > > User-Agent: StGIT/0.14.3
> > >
> > > From: Hong Liu <hong.liu@intel.com>
> > >
> > > by the PM core and the device core code. No need to manually add them in
> > > each single driver. And correct the runtime state in remove().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Hong Liu <hong.liu@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > I'd merged this a while back but was awaiting info on why v1 had a
> > cc:stable so the changelog could be updated to indicate why a -stable
> > backport was needed.
> >
> > I see that the cc:stable has been removed so that settles that. But
> > it's still unclear how serious the bugs-which-were fixed are. Oh well,
> > a bug's a bug. I put it in my 2.6.38 queue anyway.
>
> Don't think anything there is that important. Also anyone actually using
> the driver would I'm pretty sure currently be running an Intel spun
> kernel not a generic 2.6.older unless someone is also now relying on it
> for another platform anyway.
OK, thanks. Let's shoot for 2.6.39 then.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-09 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-09 12:39 [PATCH, RESEND] Putting the device into runtime suspend after resume()/probe() is handled Alan Cox
2011-03-09 21:45 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-09 21:59 ` Alan Cox
2011-03-09 22:07 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110309140712.2500862d.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=hong.liu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox