From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751950Ab1CJIzo (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2011 03:55:44 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:60401 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751223Ab1CJIzn (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2011 03:55:43 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:55:33 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Tejun Heo Cc: Yinghai Lu , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , David Rientjes , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, numa, emu: only transform numa_distance if SLIT is there Message-ID: <20110310085533.GA25171@elte.hu> References: <4D6EEDF2.6090201@kernel.org> <4D6EEEC0.3040001@kernel.org> <20110303062259.GI28266@mtj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110303062259.GI28266@mtj.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Tejun Heo wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 05:28:32PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > > > during copying should only copy with NEW numa_dist_cnt size. > > need to call numa_alloc_dist() at first, and it will set default values. > > > > So we will not need to go over the big matrix without meaning. > > > > Need to make numa_alloc_distance to return new numa_dist_cnt > > > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu > > I'm not taking this. You can't send the same change twice and expect > different result. Ping: what's the status of this - Yinghai, are you working on an improved version of these (and related) patches, as per the review suggestions from Tejun - or are you dropping them? Thanks, Ingo