public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + x86-mm-handle-mm_fault_error-in-kernel-space.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:28:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110310142812.GA25224@redhat.com> (raw)

(add cc's)

> Subject: x86/mm: handle mm_fault_error() in kernel space
> From: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>
>
> mm_fault_error() should not execute oom-killer, if page fault occurs in
> kernel space.  E.g.  in copy_from_user/copy_to_user.

Why? I don't understand this part.

> This would happen if we find ourselves in OOM on a copy_to_user(), or a
> copy_from_user() which faults.
>
> Without this patch, the kernels hangs up in copy_from_user, because OOM
> killer sends SIG_KILL to current process,

This depends. OOM can choose another victim, and if it does we shouldn't
return -EFAULT.

> but it can't handle a signal
> while in syscall, then the kernel returns to copy_from_user, reexcute
> current command and provokes page_fault again.

Yes. This is buggy.

> --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c~x86-mm-handle-mm_fault_error-in-kernel-space
> +++ a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> @@ -827,6 +827,13 @@ mm_fault_error(struct pt_regs *regs, uns
>  	       unsigned long address, unsigned int fault)
>  {
>  	if (fault & VM_FAULT_OOM) {
> +		/* Kernel mode? Handle exceptions or die: */
> +		if (!(error_code & PF_USER)) {
> +			up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
> +			no_context(regs, error_code, address);
> +			return;
> +		}
> +

At first glance, this is not optimal...

Perhaps I missed something, but afaics it is better to call
out_of_memory() first, then check if current was killed. In this case
no_context() is fine, we are not going to return to the user-mode.

IOW, what do you think about the (untested/uncompiled) patch below?

Oleg.

--- x/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ x/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -829,6 +829,11 @@ mm_fault_error(struct pt_regs *regs, uns
 {
 	if (fault & VM_FAULT_OOM) {
 		out_of_memory(regs, error_code, address);
+
+		if (!(error_code & PF_USER) && fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
+			no_context(regs, error_code, address);
+			return;
+		}
 	} else {
 		if (fault & (VM_FAULT_SIGBUS|VM_FAULT_HWPOISON|
 			     VM_FAULT_HWPOISON_LARGE))


             reply	other threads:[~2011-03-10 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-10 14:28 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-03-10 19:30 ` + x86-mm-handle-mm_fault_error-in-kernel-space.patch added to -mm tree Andrew Vagin
2011-03-11 11:19   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-11 14:21     ` Andrew Vagin
2011-03-11 16:57       ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-12 21:11         ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-13 10:29           ` KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110310142812.GA25224@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=avagin@openvz.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox