Re: [PATCH 3/3] Check for write permission on FD based posix-clocks

Thomas Gleixner
2011-03-12T17:35:45Z

On Sat, 12 Mar 2011, Richard Cochran wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 08:46:57PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > As Arnd already said -EACCES is sensible for file permission checks
> > while -EPERM means that you have no permission at all.
>
> Okay, so you will accept Torben's patch as is, into timers/core?

If there are no further objections, I'll pick it up.

Thanks,

tglx