From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@nokia.com>
Cc: omar.ramirez@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, ohad@wizery.com,
fernando.lugo@ti.com, tuomas@kulve.fi
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: tidspbridge: protect dmm_map properly
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:53:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110314155303.GB5272@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1300116128-notmuch-felipe.contreras@nokia.com>
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 05:33:09PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> greg@kroah.com wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 01:42:35AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > > > How about I send it to Linus for .39 and then add it to the .38-stable
> > > > tree when it comes out?
> > >
> > > That was the plan for .38/.37-stable. I'd say that's fine, but it
> > > would be even better to avoid people getting bit by this on plain .38.
> >
> > What is one more week, when you all waited months to get this to me? In
> > other words, why should I suddenly now rush when no one else did?
>
> The reason is because it didn't seem like it was happening often, but
> in Tuomas' case, it does so much it's basically unusable. So _now_ we
> know this could have possibly been affecting many people we didn't know
> about.
>
> You have to remember that this driver only started to work on .37, so
> people might have tried it, seen it crashing and said "oh well, it's on
> 'staging' for a reason", having no point of reference that would be a
> valid conclusion, while in fact this is a regression from pre-staging
> (the issue wasn't there).
I understand you feeling like there is a rush here, but again, please
recognize that we all have different priorities. The number of users
out there using this driver is very small and again, this patch can
safely wait until the first .38-stable release comes out.
> Anyway, I don't think .38.1 is going to be released in one week,
Is that a challenge? :)
> but I guess if people are having issues and not reporting them, they
> can wait more.
Thanks, I think they can.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-14 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-12 0:29 [PATCH] staging: tidspbridge: protect dmm_map properly Omar Ramirez Luna
2011-03-12 17:36 ` Greg KH
2011-03-12 23:42 ` Felipe Contreras
2011-03-13 1:06 ` Greg KH
2011-03-14 15:33 ` Felipe Contreras
2011-03-14 15:53 ` Greg KH [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-20 17:12 Felipe Contreras
2010-12-20 18:30 ` Kanigeri, Hari
2010-12-20 18:43 ` Felipe Contreras
2011-03-07 18:02 ` Felipe Contreras
2011-03-07 18:14 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-03-07 18:48 ` Greg KH
2011-03-07 19:29 ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2011-03-07 21:48 ` Felipe Contreras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110314155303.GB5272@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=felipe.contreras@nokia.com \
--cc=fernando.lugo@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=omar.ramirez@ti.com \
--cc=tuomas@kulve.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox