From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755430Ab1COXCu (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:02:50 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:48075 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751852Ab1COXCt (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:02:49 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:02:48 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [git pull] VFS - the first pile Message-ID: <20110315230248.GO22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20110315213248.GL22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20110315221818.GN22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 03:47:55PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Al Viro wrote: > > > > BTW, a question about rebases: is that kind of situation worth doing > > a rebase of the queue/backmerge/etc.? > > No. If it's the same patch I already applied, it will generally merge > cleanly, it's better to leave in the history than to rewrite things > just to avoid some trivial duplication. It is and it does. OK, then...