From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752228Ab1CPI5S (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2011 04:57:18 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:12225 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751490Ab1CPI5N (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2011 04:57:13 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:57:04 +0200 From: Gleb Natapov To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] Fix EDD3.0 data verification. Message-ID: <20110316085704.GD10151@redhat.com> References: <20110203122948.GX14984@redhat.com> <20110208145301.GO14984@redhat.com> <20110216150933.GE14984@redhat.com> <4D5C1DFD.5010108@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D5C1DFD.5010108@zytor.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:57:01AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 02/16/2011 07:09 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 04:53:01PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >> Peter, ping. > >> > >> Is this version acceptable? > >> > > Ping? > > > > Yes, looks good... I'll try to pull it into the tree today. > Hi Peter, Was this applied? Will it go to 2.6.39? -- Gleb.