public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Jin Dongming <jin.dongming@np.css.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Check whether pages are poisoned before copying
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:27:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110317162710.GH11094@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110317161219.GZ10696@random.random>

> What I can tell is with the default khugepaged scan rate, the
> collapse_huge_page will have an impact much smaller than KSM. It could
> have more impact than KSM if you increase khugepaged load to 100% with
> sysfs (because of the more memory that is covered by khugepaged
> compared to only the shared portion of KSM). Then the window gets much
> bigger, but still minor, if you can't trigger it with the testsuite
> it's even less likely to ever happen in practice.

You mean randomly injecting errors?
That tends to be hard and unreliable -- usually we try to have a 
specific tester that is not random.

> Did you try the testsuite with khugepaged at 100% load? I think that's
> good indication if this window has any practical significance.

The measurement is simple: run the workloads and do some dumps
with pagetypes and check if the memory with lots of pages 
has a state that can be handled by memory_failure()

AFAIK  this hasn't been done so far with THP.

-Andi
-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-17 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-17  2:30 [PATCH 0/4] THP: page collapsing vs. poisoning Hidetoshi Seto
2011-03-17  2:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] Lock the new THP when collapsing pages Hidetoshi Seto
2011-03-17  2:32 ` [PATCH 2/4] Free the collapsed pages after the new THP is mapped Hidetoshi Seto
2011-03-17  2:32 ` [PATCH 3/4] Check whether pages are poisoned before copying Hidetoshi Seto
2011-03-17  4:14   ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-17  5:20     ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-03-17  6:26       ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-17  7:43         ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-03-17 14:04           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-17 15:25             ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-17 16:12               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-17 16:27                 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2011-03-17 16:47                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-17 22:55                     ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-23 17:26             ` K.Prasad
2011-03-23 17:32               ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-17 15:21           ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-18  5:26             ` Jin Dongming
2011-03-17  2:33 ` [PATCH 4/4] Check whether the new THP is poisoned before it is mapped to APL Hidetoshi Seto

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110317162710.GH11094@one.firstfloor.org \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jin.dongming@np.css.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox