From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
jwjstone@fastmail.fm, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] watchdog, nmi: Allow hardlockup to panic by default
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:23:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110318112353.66ce884b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110318171932.GH2743@redhat.com>
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:19:32 -0400
Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 06:50:13PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 16:37:39 -0500 Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Add a Kconfig option to allow users to set the hardlockup to panic
> > > by default. Also add in a 'nmi_watchdog=nopanic' to override this.
> > >
> >
> > Changelog forgot to tell us "why".
>
> Yeah, sorry about that.
>
> When a cpu is considered stuck, instead of limping along and just printing
> a warning, it is sometimes preferred to just panic, let kdump capture the
> vmcore and reboot. This gets the machine back into a stable state quickly
> while saving the info that got it into a stuck state to begin with.
Ah, makes sense, thanks. I updated the changelog.
>
> >
> > > Format: [state][,regs][,debounce][,die]
> > >
> > > nmi_watchdog= [KNL,BUGS=X86] Debugging features for SMP kernels
> > > - Format: [panic,][num]
> > > + Format: [panic,][nopanic,][num]
> >
> > It would be better to support panic=[0|1], if that can be simply done
> > in a back-compatible fashion.
>
> I am open to the idea, just can't figure the best way to implement that in
> a backwards compatible way.
It's not worth busting a gut over ;)
> Personally I was wondering if there were situations where you would _not_
> want it to panic. If the cpu is stuck spinning after 60 seconds, the odds
> of it freeing itself is low and you are probably stuck rebooting anyway.
>
>
> >
> > > static int __init hardlockup_panic_setup(char *str)
> > > {
> > > if (!strncmp(str, "panic", 5))
> > > hardlockup_panic = 1;
> > > + else if (!strncmp(str, "nopanic", 5))
> >
> > s/5/7/
>
> doh.
>
> I can send a refreshed patch with the above changes.
I fixed that up.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-18 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-07 21:37 [PATCH 1/2 v2] watchdog, nmi: Allow hardlockup to panic by default Don Zickus
2011-03-07 21:37 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] watchdog: Always return NOTIFY_OK during cpu up/down events Don Zickus
2011-03-17 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-17 12:16 ` WANG Cong
2011-03-17 9:12 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] watchdog, nmi: Allow hardlockup to panic by default Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-17 12:05 ` WANG Cong
2011-03-18 1:50 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-18 17:19 ` Don Zickus
2011-03-18 18:23 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-03-18 18:58 ` Don Zickus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110318112353.66ce884b.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=jwjstone@fastmail.fm \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox