From: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@gmail.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Subject: [patch 11/15] sched: hierarchical task accounting for SCHED_OTHER
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 20:03:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110323030449.732563642@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110323030326.789836913@google.com
[-- Attachment #1: sched-bwc-account_nr_running.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 7249 bytes --]
With task entities participating in throttled sub-trees it is possible for
task activation/de-activation to not lead to root visible changes to
rq->nr_running. This in turn leads to incorrect idle and weight-per-task load
balance decisions.
To allow correct accounting we move responsibility for updating rq->nr_running
to the respective sched::classes. In the fair-group case this update is
hierarchical, tracking the number of active tasks rooted at each group entity.
This also allows us to fix a small buglet in pick_next_task() when group
scheduling is enabled.
Note: technically this issue also exists with the existing sched_rt
throttling; however due to the nearly complete provisioning of system
resources for rt scheduling this is much less common by default.
Signed-off-by: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
---
kernel/sched.c | 6 +----
kernel/sched_fair.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
kernel/sched_rt.c | 5 +++-
kernel/sched_stoptask.c | 2 +
4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Index: tip/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ tip/kernel/sched.c
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ struct task_group root_task_group;
/* CFS-related fields in a runqueue */
struct cfs_rq {
struct load_weight load;
- unsigned long nr_running;
+ unsigned long nr_running, h_nr_running;
u64 exec_clock;
u64 min_vruntime;
@@ -1914,7 +1914,6 @@ static void activate_task(struct rq *rq,
rq->nr_uninterruptible--;
enqueue_task(rq, p, flags);
- inc_nr_running(rq);
}
/*
@@ -1926,7 +1925,6 @@ static void deactivate_task(struct rq *r
rq->nr_uninterruptible++;
dequeue_task(rq, p, flags);
- dec_nr_running(rq);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
@@ -4174,7 +4172,7 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq)
* Optimization: we know that if all tasks are in
* the fair class we can call that function directly:
*/
- if (likely(rq->nr_running == rq->cfs.nr_running)) {
+ if (likely(rq->nr_running == rq->cfs.h_nr_running)) {
p = fair_sched_class.pick_next_task(rq);
if (likely(p))
return p;
Index: tip/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ tip/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1404,9 +1404,11 @@ static int tg_throttle_down(struct task_
static void throttle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
+ struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
struct sched_entity *se;
+ long task_delta, dequeue = 1;
- se = cfs_rq->tg->se[cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq))];
+ se = cfs_rq->tg->se[cpu_of(rq)];
/* account load preceding throttle */
rcu_read_lock();
@@ -1414,17 +1416,24 @@ static void throttle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_r
(void*)(long)rq_of(cfs_rq)->cpu);
rcu_read_unlock();
+ task_delta = -cfs_rq->h_nr_running;
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
struct cfs_rq *qcfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
/* throttled entity or throttle-on-deactivate */
if (!se->on_rq)
break;
- dequeue_entity(qcfs_rq, se, DEQUEUE_SLEEP);
+ if (dequeue)
+ dequeue_entity(qcfs_rq, se, DEQUEUE_SLEEP);
+ qcfs_rq->h_nr_running += task_delta;
+
if (qcfs_rq->load.weight)
- break;
+ dequeue = 0;
}
+ if (!se)
+ rq->nr_running += task_delta;
+
cfs_rq->throttled = 1;
cfs_rq->throttled_timestamp = rq_of(cfs_rq)->clock;
}
@@ -1435,7 +1444,7 @@ static void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs
struct sched_entity *se;
struct tg_unthrottle_down_data udd;
struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = tg_cfs_bandwidth(cfs_rq->tg);
-
+ int task_delta, enqueue = 1;
se = cfs_rq->tg->se[cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq))];
update_rq_clock(rq);
@@ -1454,16 +1463,22 @@ static void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs
if (!cfs_rq->load.weight)
return;
+ task_delta = cfs_rq->h_nr_running;
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
if (se->on_rq)
- break;
+ enqueue = 0;
cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
- enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
+ if (enqueue)
+ enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
+ cfs_rq->h_nr_running += task_delta;
if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
break;
}
+ if (!se)
+ rq->nr_running += task_delta;
+
/* determine whether we need to wake up potentially idle cpu */
if (rq->curr == rq->idle && rq->cfs.nr_running)
resched_task(rq->curr);
@@ -1637,7 +1652,7 @@ static inline void hrtick_update(struct
static void
enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
- struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
+ struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = NULL;
struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
@@ -1645,6 +1660,7 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct
break;
cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se, flags);
+ cfs_rq->h_nr_running++;
/* end evaluation on throttled cfs_rq */
if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq)) {
se = NULL;
@@ -1655,12 +1671,19 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct
}
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
- struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
+ cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
+ cfs_rq->h_nr_running++;
+
+ if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
+ break;
update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 0);
update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq);
}
+ if (!cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
+ inc_nr_running(rq);
+
hrtick_update(rq);
}
@@ -1671,12 +1694,13 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct
*/
static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
- struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
+ struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = NULL;
struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
dequeue_entity(cfs_rq, se, flags);
+ cfs_rq->h_nr_running--;
/* end evaluation on throttled cfs_rq */
if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq)) {
se = NULL;
@@ -1692,12 +1716,19 @@ static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq
}
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
- struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
+ cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
+ cfs_rq->h_nr_running--;
+
+ if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
+ break;
update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 0);
update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq);
}
+ if (!cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
+ dec_nr_running(rq);
+
hrtick_update(rq);
}
Index: tip/kernel/sched_rt.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ tip/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -910,6 +910,8 @@ enqueue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct ta
if (!task_current(rq, p) && p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
enqueue_pushable_task(rq, p);
+
+ inc_nr_running(rq);
}
static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
@@ -920,6 +922,8 @@ static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *r
dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se);
dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
+
+ dec_nr_running(rq);
}
/*
@@ -1787,4 +1791,3 @@ static void print_rt_stats(struct seq_fi
rcu_read_unlock();
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG */
-
Index: tip/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
+++ tip/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
@@ -35,11 +35,13 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_tas
static void
enqueue_task_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
+ inc_nr_running(rq);
}
static void
dequeue_task_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
+ dec_nr_running(rq);
}
static void yield_task_stop(struct rq *rq)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-23 3:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-23 3:03 [patch 00/15] CFS Bandwidth Control V5 Paul Turner
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 01/15] sched: introduce primitives to account for CFS bandwidth tracking Paul Turner
2011-03-24 12:38 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 02/15] sched: validate CFS quota hierarchies Paul Turner
2011-03-23 10:39 ` torbenh
2011-03-23 20:49 ` Paul Turner
2011-03-24 6:31 ` Bharata B Rao
2011-04-08 17:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-29 6:57 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-04-04 23:10 ` Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 03/15] sched: accumulate per-cfs_rq cpu usage Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-06 20:44 ` Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-06 20:47 ` Paul Turner
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 04/15] sched: throttle cfs_rq entities which exceed their local quota Paul Turner
2011-03-23 5:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-03-23 20:53 ` Paul Turner
2011-03-24 6:36 ` Bharata B Rao
2011-03-24 7:40 ` Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 23:15 ` Paul Turner
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 05/15] sched: unthrottle cfs_rq(s) who ran out of quota at period refresh Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 13:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 06/15] sched: allow for positional tg_tree walks Paul Turner
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 07/15] sched: prevent interactions between throttled entities and load-balance Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 08/15] sched: migrate throttled tasks on HOTPLUG Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-06 2:31 ` Paul Turner
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 09/15] sched: add exports tracking cfs bandwidth control statistics Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 10/15] sched: (fixlet) dont update shares twice on on_rq parent Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` Paul Turner [this message]
2011-04-05 13:28 ` [patch 11/15] sched: hierarchical task accounting for SCHED_OTHER Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 12/15] sched: maintain throttled rqs as a list Paul Turner
2011-04-22 2:50 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-04-24 21:23 ` Paul Turner
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 13/15] sched: expire slack quota using generation counters Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-06 7:22 ` Paul Turner
2011-04-06 8:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-06 11:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 14/15] sched: return unused quota on voluntary sleep Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-06 2:25 ` Paul Turner
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 15/15] sched: add documentation for bandwidth control Paul Turner
2011-03-24 6:38 ` Bharata B Rao
2011-03-24 16:12 ` [patch 00/15] CFS Bandwidth Control V5 Bharata B Rao
2011-03-31 7:57 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-04-04 23:10 ` Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-20 2:12 ` Test for CFS Bandwidth Control V6 Xiao Guangrong
2011-05-24 0:53 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-24 7:56 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-08 2:54 ` Paul Turner
2011-06-08 5:55 ` Hidetoshi Seto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110323030449.732563642@google.com \
--to=pjt@google.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dhaval.giani@gmail.com \
--cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).