From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Joe Korty <joe.korty@ccur.com>
Cc: "fweisbec@gmail.com" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"laijs@cn.fujitsu.com" <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"dhowells@redhat.com" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"loic.minier@linaro.org" <loic.minier@linaro.org>,
"dhaval.giani@gmail.com" <dhaval.giani@gmail.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"josh@joshtriplett.org" <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
"houston.jim@comcast.net" <houston.jim@comcast.net>,
"andi@firstfloor.org" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] jrcu: fix broken rcu_barrier
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:35:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110323063524.GS2322@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110314220928.GA1348@tsunami.ccur.com>
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 06:09:28PM -0400, Joe Korty wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 04:47:18AM -0400, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:50:44PM -0400, Joe Korty wrote:
> > > +void rcu_barrier(void)
> > > +{
> > > + synchronize_sched();
> > > + synchronize_sched();
> > > +}
> >
> > This is still broken. You need to wait until all pre-existing RCU
> > callbacks on all CPUs have been invoked. Although this does guarantee
> > that all callbacks on the current CPU have been invoked, if one of the
> > other CPUs is busy, it might not yet have processed the callbacks from
> > earlier grace periods. The usual way to take care of this is to post
> > a callback on each CPU, then wait for them all to be invoked.
>
> Hi Paul,
> JRCU (eventually) chains together all callbacks from all
> cpus into a single queue and then it expires that single
> queue. So the double synchronize_sched() should work as
> a rcu_barrier implementation.
Hello, Joe,
So the following grace period is not permitted to start until all of
the callbacks from the prior grace period have been invoked?
Or am I missing something subtle here?
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-23 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-14 3:50 [PATCH 8/9] jrcu: fix broken rcu_barrier Joe Korty
2011-03-14 8:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-03-14 22:09 ` Joe Korty
2011-03-23 6:35 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-03-23 13:46 ` Joe Korty
2011-03-24 0:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110323063524.GS2322@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dhaval.giani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=houston.jim@comcast.net \
--cc=joe.korty@ccur.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic.minier@linaro.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox