From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] checkpatch: add option to change warning return value.
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:07:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110323100707.GC2297@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110322231310.GA7338@xanatos>
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 04:13:10PM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> There are a lot of warnings in checkpatch.pl that are rather subjective.
> For instance, when a line is 81 characters long, and the patch submitter
> is just cleaning up existing code, a maintainer may not care that
> checkpatch.pl warns about the over 80-character line. It should be up to
> the maintainer what warnings they want to pay attention to.
>
> Unfortunately, if you try to run checkpatch.pl as part of a git pre-commit
> hook and a patch in a series being applied by git-am fails checkpatch.pl,
> the whole process stops. At that point I usually end up just disabling
> that git hook, which means I don't see real errors in the patches.
>
> Add an option to checkpatch.pl to print the warnings, but not return an
> error code when the --lazy flag is present. (Anyone with a better name
> can pipe up, lazy just seemed to be the opposite to strict.) This allows
> the maintainer to view the warnings, but still allow the patch application
> process to continue.
I first thought you would add code that allowed turning only select
errors into warnings.
If you just want to have git continue in any case, why not append
'|| true' to the line that invokes checkpatch in your hook script?
Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-23 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-22 23:13 [RFC] checkpatch: add option to change warning return value Sarah Sharp
2011-03-22 23:22 ` Sarah Sharp
2011-03-22 23:40 ` [RFC v2] Checkpatch: " Sarah Sharp
2011-03-23 1:41 ` [RFC] checkpatch: " Steven Rostedt
2011-03-24 15:40 ` Sarah Sharp
2011-03-24 18:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-03-24 22:02 ` Sarah Sharp
2011-03-23 10:07 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2011-03-23 18:43 ` Sarah Sharp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110323100707.GC2297@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox