Re: [RFC] usbnet: use eth%d name for known ethernet devices

Randy Dunlap
2011-03-23T20:00:04Z

On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:57:18 +0100 Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Wednesday 23 March 2011 20:53:13 Michał Nazarewicz wrote:
> > On Mar 23, 2011 8:36 PM, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday 23 March 2011 19:46:50 Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > @@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ struct driver_info {
> > > > >
> > > > > #define FLAG_LINK_INTR 0x0800 /* updates link (carrier) status */
> > > > >
> > > > > +#define FLAG_PTP 0x1000 /* maybe use "usb%d" names */
> > > >
> > > > "PTP"? What does that stand for?
> > >
> > > point-to-point, I'll improve the comment to spell it out when I send the
> > > fixed version.
> >
> > I think P2P could be better.
>
> Yes, good idea.

that's peer-to-peer.

OTOH, I knew that PTP was point-to-point.

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***