From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755370Ab1CWIKK (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Mar 2011 04:10:10 -0400 Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.36]:43948 "EHLO fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754599Ab1CWIKE (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Mar 2011 04:10:04 -0400 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86,mm: make pagefault killable Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , David Rientjes , Linus Torvalds , Rik van Riel , Oleg Nesterov , linux-mm , Andrey Vagin , Hugh Dickins In-Reply-To: <20110323164949.5be6aa48.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20110322200945.B06D.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110323164949.5be6aa48.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-Id: <20110323171051.1ADA.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.56.05 [ja] Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:09:59 +0900 (JST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 20:09:29 +0900 (JST) > KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > > When oom killer occured, almost processes are getting stuck following > > two points. > > > > 1) __alloc_pages_nodemask > > 2) __lock_page_or_retry > > > > 1) is not much problematic because TIF_MEMDIE lead to make allocation > > failure and get out from page allocator. 2) is more problematic. When > > OOM situation, Zones typically don't have page cache at all and Memory > > starvation might lead to reduce IO performance largely. When fork bomb > > occur, TIF_MEMDIE task don't die quickly mean fork bomb may create > > new process quickly rather than oom-killer kill it. Then, the system > > may become livelock. > > > > This patch makes pagefault interruptible by SIGKILL. > > > > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro > > --- > > arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 9 +++++++++ > > include/linux/mm.h | 1 + > > mm/filemap.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++----- > > 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c > > index 20e3f87..797c7d0 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c > > @@ -1035,6 +1035,7 @@ do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code) > > if (user_mode_vm(regs)) { > > local_irq_enable(); > > error_code |= PF_USER; > > + flags |= FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE; > > } else { > > if (regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_IF) > > local_irq_enable(); > > @@ -1138,6 +1139,14 @@ good_area: > > } > > > > /* > > + * Pagefault was interrupted by SIGKILL. We have no reason to > > + * continue pagefault. > > + */ > > + if ((flags & FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE) && (fault & VM_FAULT_RETRY) && > > + fatal_signal_pending(current)) > > + return; > > + > > Hmm? up_read(&mm->mmap_sem) ? When __lock_page_or_retry() return 0, It call up_read(mmap_sem) in this function. I agree this is strange (or ugly). but I don't want change this spec in this time.