From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Daniel Reichelt <debian@nachtgeist.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: procfs: boot- and runtime configurable access mode for /proc/<pid> dirs
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:37:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110324203758.GF22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D8B991E.5070604@nachtgeist.net>
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 08:18:54PM +0100, Daniel Reichelt wrote:
> Well, my patch is about modes of the pid-dirs themselves, not their
> contents. And it changes procfs' behaviour about modes both on initial
> creation and during revalidation on access. However flattening all the
> piddir's entries DOES pose a security risk. Have a look at the
> "traditional behaviour": piddir world-readable, however e.g.
> <pid>/environ isn't. Often it's a workaround for broken software to
> specify a password within an environment variable instead of by cmdline.
> Since up until now all processes including their full cmdlines are
> visible to everyone, environ must be considered more sensitive than a
> cmdline.
Bull. /proc/<pid>/foo contents is sensitive, your patch doesn't do
you any good. fork(), open /proc/<child's PID>/foo in parent, then
exec suid-root binary in child. At that point mode_t of any files
or directories does not matter anymore.
You *must* do whatever access checks at read(2) time for these files.
And if you do that, the checks at open(2) time do not matter.
In particular, /proc/*/environ does ptrace_may_access() on read(2) (with
a race fixed by today's merge, BTW). It could very well be r--r--r--;
having it r-------- does not increase security at all.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-24 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-24 4:09 procfs: boot- and runtime configurable access mode for /proc/<pid> dirs Daniel Reichelt
2011-03-24 7:32 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2011-03-24 8:41 ` Daniel Reichelt
2011-03-24 18:22 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2011-03-24 18:44 ` Al Viro
2011-03-24 18:49 ` Daniel Reichelt
2011-03-24 19:18 ` Daniel Reichelt
2011-03-24 20:37 ` Al Viro [this message]
2011-03-25 21:24 ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-26 10:56 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110324203758.GF22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=debian@nachtgeist.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox