From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Core block IO bits for 2.6.39 - early Oops
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:41:28 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110325044128.GJ26611@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110324193441.GA1723@gentoo.trippels.de>
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 08:34:41PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2011.03.24 at 19:58 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On 2011-03-24 19:54, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > On 2011.03.24 at 19:51 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >> On 2011-03-24 19:36, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >>> On 2011-03-24 19:30, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > >>>> On 2011.03.24 at 14:43 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This is the main pull request for the block IO layer and friends for
> > >>>>> 2.6.39.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This merge results in an early oops on my system (amd64, xfs).
> > >>>> See the attached photo.
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Auch. Can you ensure that you have CONFIG_DEBUGINFO=y in your .config
> > >>> and then do:
> > >>>
> > >>> $ gdb vmlinux
> > >>> ...
> > >>> l *cfq_insert_request+0x32
> > >>>
> > >>> and send that output?
> > >>
> > >> I took a closer look at the oops, and it most likely looks like q ==
> > >> NULL (offset 0x18 == q->elevator). You left out the Code part, so I
> > >> can't verify that for certain. Which makes very little sense. I take it
> > >> this is 100% reproducible? When you send the gdb output, please also
> > >> attach your .config.
> > >
> > > Yes, it's 100% reproducible here. My .config follows:
> >
> > Can you try this patch and see if it makes a difference?
>
> There's no patch ;-)
>
> > If you boot without the patch and add elevator=noop, does it then work?
>
> It works insofar as the Oops is gone. But my xfs partitions apparently
> still get corrupted (I had to run xfs_repair on several of them, because
> they would not mount otherwise).
So the patchset is causing repeatable filesystem corruption? Sounds
to me like this series is not yet ready for mainline merging. Last
thing I want to spend the .39 cycle helping people recover busted
filesystems as a result of undercooked block layer changes...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-25 4:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-24 13:43 [GIT PULL] Core block IO bits for 2.6.39 Jens Axboe
2011-03-24 18:30 ` [GIT PULL] Core block IO bits for 2.6.39 - early Oops Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-24 18:36 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-24 18:47 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-24 18:51 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-24 18:54 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-24 18:58 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-24 19:34 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-24 19:36 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-24 19:45 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-24 19:57 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-24 20:06 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-24 21:01 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-24 21:41 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-25 7:23 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-25 8:37 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-25 8:44 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-25 9:27 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-25 9:57 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-25 10:11 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-25 12:44 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-25 13:09 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-25 14:10 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-25 14:14 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-25 14:18 ` Chris Mason
2011-03-25 14:19 ` Chris Mason
2011-03-25 14:24 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-25 14:20 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-25 14:28 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-25 15:51 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-25 15:58 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-25 16:01 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-24 22:06 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-25 4:41 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2011-03-25 7:26 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-25 11:59 ` Theodore Tso
2011-03-25 12:14 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-25 12:33 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-03-25 12:43 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-25 13:01 ` Chris Mason
2011-03-25 21:35 ` [GIT PULL] Core block IO bits for 2.6.39 Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-03-26 6:29 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-26 7:21 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-03-26 8:25 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-26 8:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-03-26 9:26 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-26 16:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-26 16:53 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-26 18:48 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-27 13:21 ` Alan Cox
2011-03-27 11:49 ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-27 12:00 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110325044128.GJ26611@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox