From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751889Ab1CYMlR (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:41:17 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:42688 "EHLO opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750982Ab1CYMlQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:41:16 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:41:14 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , Andrew Morton , Samuel Ortiz Subject: Re: [patch 09/10] mfd: Cleanup irq namespace Message-ID: <20110325124114.GG31415@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <20110325110939.701487744@linutronix.de> <20110325111218.440617746@linutronix.de> <20110325120830.GC22502@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Don't Worry, Be Happy. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 01:33:34PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 25 Mar 2011, Mark Brown wrote: > > it looks like you also need to update the set_irq_flags() naming. > No, that's an ARM thing. It seems like if you're going through and renaming all the genirq APIs then it'd be only sensible to also go through and do the same thing for the ARM extensions, the new code looks less clean in the affected areas.