From: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv2 1/4] drivers/otp: add initial support for OTP memory
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 22:27:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110325222716.GT3130@pulham.picochip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinh+A-pxYYda6W58hNR+_N_rxX5qx-KegE0OzQH@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 05:32:54PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 06:08, Jamie Iles wrote:
> > I guess in this framework we could make the OTP look like a single
> > region of the 0x80 data pages concatenated or provide separate regions
> > for each group of 0x80 pages but the control and ECC pages aren't
> > directly accessible by the user.
>
> well, in the current driver, i let people dump the ECC. for
> debugging, i think that's valuable.
Hmm, that does sound potentially useful. In v3 I've created a single
partition that excludes the control bits and the ecc. How about I
change that for the next spin so there are two partitions where the
first contains the raw data and the second is all of the ECC lumped
together. It may also be useful to have a name attribute for each
region to make this clear.
It's either that or add another ioctl() for getting the ECC but that
doesn't feel very nice.
> > The other question that brings up is whether any compatibility with the
> > old driver is required.
>
> it's already going to be changing names ;). but what other
> compatibility are you thinking of ? the requirements are you have to
> be able to:
> - read it
> - write in full/aligned 64bit chunks
> - do an OTPLOCK ioctl (the drivers uses this to manage the first few
> pages which flags all other pages as "locked")
Well the current version will do all of that so I think if we add the
ECC dumping ability then everything is there.
Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-25 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-24 15:21 [RFC PATCHv2 0/4] Support for OTP memory Jamie Iles
2011-03-24 15:21 ` [RFC PATCHv2 1/4] drivers/otp: add initial support " Jamie Iles
2011-03-24 18:32 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 20:35 ` Jamie Iles
2011-03-24 21:33 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-25 10:08 ` Jamie Iles
2011-03-25 21:32 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-25 22:27 ` Jamie Iles [this message]
2011-03-25 22:36 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 19:20 ` Greg KH
2011-03-24 20:49 ` Jamie Iles
2011-03-25 20:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-25 21:12 ` Greg KH
2011-03-25 22:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-25 23:28 ` Greg KH
2011-03-26 11:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-26 15:10 ` Greg KH
2011-03-28 13:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-25 22:23 ` Jamie Iles
2011-03-25 22:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-25 22:38 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-25 22:52 ` Jamie Iles
2011-03-25 23:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-26 0:21 ` Jamie Iles
2011-03-26 2:16 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-26 2:40 ` Jamie Iles
2011-03-26 10:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-26 17:55 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-26 20:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-27 3:52 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-27 11:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-25 22:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-24 15:21 ` [RFC PATCHv2 2/4] drivers/otp: add support for Picoxcell PC3X3 OTP Jamie Iles
2011-03-24 18:50 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 20:59 ` Jamie Iles
2011-03-24 21:40 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 15:21 ` [RFC PATCHv2 3/4] drivers/otp: allow an ioctl to be specified Jamie Iles
2011-03-24 18:35 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 20:36 ` Jamie Iles
2011-03-24 15:21 ` [RFC PATCHv2 4/4] drivers/otp: convert bfin otp to generic OTP Jamie Iles
2011-03-24 18:52 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 20:40 ` Jamie Iles
2011-03-24 17:39 ` [RFC PATCHv2 0/4] Support for OTP memory Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 17:47 ` Jamie Iles
2011-03-24 17:56 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 18:32 ` Jamie Iles
2011-03-24 18:36 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 20:38 ` Jamie Iles
2011-03-25 0:12 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110325222716.GT3130@pulham.picochip.com \
--to=jamie@jamieiles.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox