public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lina Lu" <lulina_nuaa@foxmail.com>
To: "Vivek Goyal" <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux kernel mailing list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: cfq-iosched.c:Use cfqq->nr_sectors in charge the vdisktime
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 23:23:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201103302323256090890@foxmail.com> (raw)

Hi Vivek,
      I find the weight policy can be more accuracy with cfqq->nr_sectors instead
of cfqq->slice_dispatch. 
      Today, I try to modify cfq_group_served(), and use "charge = cfqq->nr_sectors; "
instead of "charge = cfqq->slice_dispatch; " . The test result seens more accuracy.
Why you choose slice_dispatch here? Is the nr_sectors will lower the total performance?
      And in iops mod, if I try to apply weight policy on two IO processes with different 
avgrq-sz, the test results will not exact match the weight value.

Thanks
Lina


             reply	other threads:[~2011-03-30 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-30 15:23 Lina Lu [this message]
2011-03-30 15:54 ` cfq-iosched.c:Use cfqq->nr_sectors in charge the vdisktime Vivek Goyal
2011-03-31 15:46 ` Lina Lu
2011-03-31 19:46   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-01 14:59   ` Lina Lu
2011-04-01 15:22     ` Vivek Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201103302323256090890@foxmail.com \
    --to=lulina_nuaa@foxmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox