public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
To: Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz@tieto.com
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hthebaud@insidefr.com,
	matti.j.aaltonen@nokia.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Sebastian.Chlad@tieto.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFC: Driver for Inside Secure MicroRead NFC chip
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:09:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110331150939.GC2704@sortiz-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99B09243E1A5DA4898CDD8B7001114481085F0FE5A@EXMB04.eu.tieto.com>

Hi Waldemar,

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 05:42:21PM +0300, Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz@tieto.com wrote:
> >My idea of an initial NFC subsystem architecture was actually 
> >the following
> >one:
> >- A core NFC layer against which NFC drivers would register.
> >- A netlink socket for handling the HCI commands. That would 
> >put a big part of the NFC HCI layer in kernel land and could 
> >potentially simplify the existing NFC stacks.
> 
> Shouldn't be better to add a new AF_NFC sock family and then register new LLCP and HCI protocols?
> 
That's the Bluetooth approach, and it works just fine as well.
However, the netlink option for sending commands and receiving answers to/from
a subsystem sounds more appropriate, at least to me.

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-03-31 15:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-18 10:40 [PATCH] NFC: Driver for Inside Secure MicroRead NFC chip Waldemar Rymarkiewicz
2011-03-18 10:40 ` Waldemar Rymarkiewicz
2011-03-18 11:03   ` Alan Cox
2011-03-18 15:00     ` Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz
2011-03-18 15:05       ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-18 15:12       ` Alan Cox
2011-03-18 15:15         ` Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz
2011-03-18 11:49   ` Wolfram Sang
2011-03-18 15:08     ` Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz
2011-03-18 15:31       ` Mark Brown
2011-03-18 16:43     ` Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz
2011-03-18 12:19   ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-18 12:51     ` Mark Brown
2011-03-18 14:20       ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-25 14:26     ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-03-29  8:00       ` Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz
2011-03-29 11:05         ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-29 11:59           ` Alan Cox
2011-03-29 12:04             ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-29 12:23               ` Alan Cox
2011-03-29 13:22                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-31 14:16           ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-03-31 14:42             ` Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz
2011-03-31 14:49               ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-31 15:09               ` Samuel Ortiz [this message]
2011-03-31 15:24                 ` Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz
2011-03-31 15:30                   ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-04-01 18:19                     ` Aloisio Almeida
2011-04-01 19:43                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-06 20:22                     ` Pavan Savoy
2011-06-06 20:30                       ` Pavan Savoy
2011-06-06 20:46                         ` Aloisio Almeida
2011-06-06 20:50                       ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-03-18 15:50   ` Randy Dunlap
2011-03-18 15:57     ` Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-03-10 14:20 Waldemar Rymarkiewicz
2011-03-10 13:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-10 14:45   ` Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz
2011-03-10 16:20     ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-14 14:59       ` Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz
2011-03-14 15:34         ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-14 15:45           ` Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz
2011-03-14 16:00             ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-14 16:15               ` Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz
2011-03-14 17:01                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-15  8:37                   ` Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz
2011-03-15  9:06                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-17 12:58       ` Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz
2011-03-17 13:07         ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-17 13:38           ` Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz
2011-03-17 13:54             ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-17 13:58               ` Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110331150939.GC2704@sortiz-mobl \
    --to=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Sebastian.Chlad@tieto.com \
    --cc=Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz@tieto.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=hthebaud@insidefr.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matti.j.aaltonen@nokia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox