From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@gmail.com>
To: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
tglx@linutronix.de, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, arnd@arndb.de,
nico@fluxnic.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] basic_mmio_gpio: remove runtime width/endianness evaluation
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:12:58 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110406121258.GA9530@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302088263-12714-2-git-send-email-jamie@jamieiles.com>
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 12:10:57PM +0100, Jamie Iles wrote:
> Remove endianness/width calculations at runtime by installing function
> pointers for bit-to-mask conversion and register accessors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
> Cc: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@gmail.com>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
I guess there should be Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
:-)
[...]
> @@ -74,7 +78,8 @@ struct bgpio_chip {
> * Some GPIO controllers work with the big-endian bits notation,
> * e.g. in a 8-bits register, GPIO7 is the least significant bit.
> */
> - int big_endian_bits;
> + unsigned long (*pin2mask)(struct bgpio_chip *bgc, unsigned int pin);
> +
>
> /*
No need for this new empty line, I think.
[...]
> +static unsigned long bgpio_write64(void __iomem *reg, unsigned long data)
> +{
> + return __raw_writeq(data, reg);
> +}
I was getting this on a 64 bit machine:
CHECK drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c
drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c:138:16: warning: incorrect type in return expression (different base types)
drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c:138:16: expected unsigned long
drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c:138:16: got void
drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c:302:33: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c:302:33: expected void ( *write_reg )( ... )
drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c:302:33: got unsigned long ( static [toplevel] *<noident> )( ... )
CC drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.o
drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c: In function ‘bgpio_write64’:
drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c:138: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c: In function ‘bgpio_setup_accessors’:
drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c:302: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type
make[1]: *** [drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.o] Error 1
And I fixed it with this:
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c
index 9dad485..3ddc4b2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c
@@ -133,9 +133,9 @@ static unsigned long bgpio_read32(void __iomem *reg)
}
#if BITS_PER_LONG >= 64
-static unsigned long bgpio_write64(void __iomem *reg, unsigned long data)
+static void bgpio_write64(void __iomem *reg, unsigned long data)
{
- return __raw_writeq(data, reg);
+ __raw_writeq(data, reg);
}
static unsigned long bgpio_read64(void __iomem *reg)
Otherwise, the patch looks perfect.
Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@gmail.com>
Thanks!
--
Anton Vorontsov
Email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-06 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-06 11:10 [RFC PATCH 0/7] gpio: extend basic_mmio_gpio for different controllers Jamie Iles
2011-04-06 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] basic_mmio_gpio: remove runtime width/endianness evaluation Jamie Iles
2011-04-06 12:12 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2011-04-06 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] basic_mmio_gpio: convert to platform_{get,set}_drvdata() Jamie Iles
2011-04-06 12:16 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-04-06 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] basic_mmio_gpio: allow overriding number of gpio Jamie Iles
2011-04-06 12:18 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-04-06 11:11 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] basic_mmio_gpio: request register regions Jamie Iles
2011-04-06 12:32 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-04-06 11:11 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] basic_mmio_gpio: detect output method at probe time Jamie Iles
2011-04-06 12:33 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-04-06 11:11 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] basic_mmio_gpio: support different input/output registers Jamie Iles
2011-04-06 12:16 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-04-06 11:11 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] basic_mmio_gpio: support direction registers Jamie Iles
2011-04-06 12:12 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-04-08 0:14 ` Jamie Iles
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110406121258.GA9530@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=cbouatmailru@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=jamie@jamieiles.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox