From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@MIT.EDU>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT/PATCH v2 1/6] x86-64: Clean up vdso/kernel shared variables
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 10:08:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110407080825.GF24879@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c79ac2a9a1caad9865ffa3c4a05438227c59f63e.1302137785.git.luto@mit.edu>
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@MIT.EDU> wrote:
> Variables that are shared between the vdso and the kernel are
> currently a bit of a mess. They are each defined with their own
> magic, they are accessed differently in the kernel, the vsyscall page,
> and the vdso, and one of them (vsyscall_clock) doesn't even really
> exist.
>
> This changes them all to use a common mechanism. All of them are
> delcared in vvar.h with a fixed address (validated by the linker
> script). In the kernel (as before), they look like ordinary
> read-write variables. In the vsyscall page and the vdso, they are
> accessed through a new macro VVAR, which gives read-only access.
>
> The vdso is now loaded verbatim into memory without any fixups. As a
> side bonus, access from the vdso is faster because a level of
> indirection is removed.
Ok, that's a pretty nice consolidation and speedup.
This layout:
> +DECLARE_VVAR(0, volatile unsigned long, jiffies)
> +DECLARE_VVAR(128, struct vsyscall_gtod_data, vsyscall_gtod_data)
> +DECLARE_VVAR(256, int, vgetcpu_mode)
Is spread out too much, using up several separate cachelines with nothing else
on them. Why not pack it tightly, with natural alignment taken into
consideration?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-07 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-07 2:03 [RFT/PATCH v2 0/6] Micro-optimize vclock_gettime Andy Lutomirski
2011-04-07 2:03 ` [RFT/PATCH v2 1/6] x86-64: Clean up vdso/kernel shared variables Andy Lutomirski
2011-04-07 8:08 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-04-07 2:03 ` [RFT/PATCH v2 2/6] x86-64: Optimize vread_tsc's barriers Andy Lutomirski
2011-04-07 8:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-07 11:44 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-04-07 15:23 ` Andi Kleen
2011-04-07 17:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-07 16:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-07 16:42 ` Andi Kleen
2011-04-07 17:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-07 18:15 ` Andi Kleen
2011-04-07 18:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-07 21:26 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-04-08 17:59 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-04-09 11:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-07 21:43 ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2011-04-07 22:52 ` Andi Kleen
2011-04-07 2:04 ` [RFT/PATCH v2 3/6] x86-64: Don't generate cmov in vread_tsc Andy Lutomirski
2011-04-07 7:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-07 11:25 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-04-07 2:04 ` [RFT/PATCH v2 4/6] x86-64: vclock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC) can't ever see nsec < 0 Andy Lutomirski
2011-04-07 7:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-07 11:27 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-04-07 2:04 ` [RFT/PATCH v2 5/6] x86-64: Move vread_tsc into a new file with sensible options Andy Lutomirski
2011-04-07 2:04 ` [RFT/PATCH v2 6/6] x86-64: Turn off -pg and turn on -foptimize-sibling-calls for vDSO Andy Lutomirski
2011-04-07 8:03 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110407080825.GF24879@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@MIT.EDU \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox