public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 8/9] perf: Change close() semantics for group events
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 21:17:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110409192142.038377551@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110409191739.813727025@chello.nl

[-- Attachment #1: perf-remove-on-close.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1507 bytes --]

In order to always call list_del_event() on the correct cpu if the
event is part of an active context and avoid having to do two IPIs,
change the close() semantics slightly.

The current perf_event_disable() call would disable a whole group if
the event that's being closed is the group leader, whereas the new
code keeps the group siblings enabled.

People should not rely on this behaviour and I don't think they do,
but in case we find they do, the fix is easy and we have to take the
double IPI cost.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
 kernel/perf_event.c |    8 +-------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/perf_event.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -2920,12 +2920,6 @@ int perf_event_release_kernel(struct per
 {
 	struct perf_event_context *ctx = event->ctx;
 
-	/*
-	 * Remove from the PMU, can't get re-enabled since we got
-	 * here because the last ref went.
-	 */
-	perf_event_disable(event);
-
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx->parent_ctx);
 	/*
 	 * There are two ways this annotation is useful:
@@ -2942,8 +2936,8 @@ int perf_event_release_kernel(struct per
 	mutex_lock_nested(&ctx->mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
 	raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
 	perf_group_detach(event);
-	list_del_event(event, ctx);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+	perf_remove_from_context(event);
 	mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
 
 	free_event(event);



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-04-09 19:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-09 19:17 [RFC][PATCH 0/9] perf: Rework event scheduling Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-09 19:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/9] perf: Optimize ctx_sched_out Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-28 16:38   ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Optimize ctx_sched_out() tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-09 19:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/9] perf: Clean up ctx reference counting Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-11  6:05   ` Lin Ming
2011-04-11  8:35     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-28 16:39   ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Clean up 'ctx' " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-09 19:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/9] perf: Change event scheduling locking Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-28 16:39   ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Optimize " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-09 19:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/9] perf: Remove task_ctx_sched_in Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-28 16:39   ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Remove task_ctx_sched_in() tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-09 19:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/9] perf: Simplify and fix __perf_install_in_context Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-10  8:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-11  8:44     ` Lin Ming
2011-04-11  8:50       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-11  8:12   ` Lin Ming
2011-05-28 16:40   ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Simplify and fix __perf_install_in_context() tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-09 19:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/9] perf: Change ctx::is_active semantics Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-28 16:40   ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Change and simplify " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-09 19:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/9] perf: Collect the schedule in rules in one function Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-28 16:41   ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Collect the schedule-in " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-09 19:17 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-05-28 16:41   ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Change close() semantics for group events tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-09 19:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 9/9] perf: De-schedule a task context when removing the last event Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-28 16:42   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110409192142.038377551@chello.nl \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox