From: "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>,
"Xu, Andiry" <Andiry.Xu@amd.com>,
USB list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] USB host: Fix lockdep warning in AMD PLL quirk
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:16:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110411161647.GK23633@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1104111144540.1975-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:49:30AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 02:26:00AM -0400, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > You mean 2.6.39-rc2 right? I'm asking because I hit the same warning
> > > with 39-rc2 now too but it didn't appear with .38 - so it has to have
> > > snuck in after the merge window. If so, you don't need the stable tag.
> >
> > You were right, just tested plain 2.6.38 and it doesn't happen. So I
> > removed the stable tag. Here is the updated patch.
>
> ...
>
> > --- a/drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c
> > @@ -84,65 +84,92 @@ int usb_amd_find_chipset_info(void)
> > {
>
> ...
>
> > +commit:
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&amd_lock, flags);
> > + if (amd_chipset.probe_count > 0) {
> > + /* race - someone else was faster - drop devices */
> > +
> > + /* Mark that we where here */
> > + amd_chipset.probe_count++;
>
> This line should be moved above the "if" statement, since you always
> want to increment the count.
No, probe_count can't be incremented here because the probe is not
finished yet. If another thread jumps in after the lock is released and
detects probe_count > 0 while the probe hasn't happened the quirk will
fail. So we need to make sure that amd_chipset.probe_count does not
become > 0 before the probe is finished.
>
> > + ret = amd_chipset.probe_result;
> > +
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&amd_lock, flags);
> > +
> > + if (info.nb_dev)
> > + pci_dev_put(info.nb_dev);
> > + if (info.smbus_dev)
> > + pci_dev_put(info.smbus_dev);
> > +
> > + } else {
> > + /* no race - commit the result */
> > + info.probe_count++;
>
> This isn't right, because info.probe_count was initialized to 0. Maybe
> amd_chipset.probe_count should be made into a separate variable, not a
> part of the structure, like amd_lock.
The purpose of the struct is structuring of data. In theory all of its
members could be turned into global variables. The amd_lock is different
because it does not only protect the struct but also access to the
hardware while the quirk is applied/unapplied.
Joerg
--
AMD Operating System Research Center
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach
General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-11 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-06 11:21 [PATCH] USB host: Fix lockdep warning in AMD PLL quirk Joerg Roedel
2011-04-06 15:16 ` Alan Stern
2011-04-06 15:25 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-07 2:21 ` Xu, Andiry
2011-04-07 7:50 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-07 9:01 ` Xu, Andiry
2011-04-07 13:00 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-07 15:01 ` Alan Stern
2011-04-07 20:22 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-08 14:26 ` [PATCH v4] " Joerg Roedel
2011-04-08 14:52 ` Alan Stern
2011-04-08 15:09 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-08 16:30 ` Alan Stern
2011-04-07 8:26 ` [PATCH] " Joerg Roedel
2011-04-07 9:58 ` Xu, Andiry
2011-04-07 12:52 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-07 13:14 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-11 6:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-04-11 6:43 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-11 6:59 ` [PATCH v5] " Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-11 10:00 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-04-11 15:49 ` Alan Stern
2011-04-11 16:16 ` Roedel, Joerg [this message]
2011-04-11 16:25 ` Alan Stern
2011-04-11 16:37 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-11 17:05 ` Alan Stern
2011-04-12 6:41 ` [PATCH v6] " Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-12 10:59 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-04-12 11:13 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-13 6:38 ` [PATCH v7] " Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-13 14:44 ` Alan Stern
2011-04-07 14:35 ` [PATCH] " Alan Stern
2011-04-07 15:00 ` Roedel, Joerg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110411161647.GK23633@amd.com \
--to=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=Andiry.Xu@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox