From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] signals: Always place SIGCONT and SIGSTOP on 'shared_pending'
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 20:50:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110411185005.GA4240@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110406141548.1e0736ce@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
On 04/06, Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> Yeah, good point. This patch definitely needs dropping from the series.
Yes.
Sorry for delay again. I'll try to read the rest of this series tomorrow,
I can no longer look at signal.c to today.
Oh, these changes do not look trivial. I must admit, I am a bit sceptical,
but this is only my first impression based on amount on changes and more
complex locking.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-11 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-05 19:21 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Improve signal delivery scalability Matt Fleming
2011-04-05 19:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] signals: Always place SIGCONT and SIGSTOP on 'shared_pending' Matt Fleming
2011-04-05 20:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-05 20:50 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-06 12:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-06 13:09 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-06 13:30 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-06 13:15 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-11 18:50 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-04-11 19:24 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-05 19:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] signals: Introduce per-thread siglock and action rwlock Matt Fleming
2011-04-13 19:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-14 10:34 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-14 19:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-16 13:08 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-18 16:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-21 19:03 ` arch/tile/kernel/hardwall.c:do_hardwall_trap unsafe/wrong usage of ->sighand Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 13:04 ` Chris Metcalf
2011-04-26 20:36 ` [PATCH 0/1] tile: do_hardwall_trap: do not play with task->sighand Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-26 20:37 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-02 22:42 ` Chris Metcalf
2011-04-26 9:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] signals: Introduce per-thread siglock and action rwlock Matt Fleming
2011-04-05 19:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] ia64: Catch up with new sighand action spinlock Matt Fleming
2011-04-05 19:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] signals: Introduce __dequeue_private_signal helper function Matt Fleming
2011-04-05 19:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] signals: Don't hold shared siglock across signal delivery Matt Fleming
2011-04-13 20:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-14 10:57 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-14 19:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-16 13:27 ` Matt Fleming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110411185005.GA4240@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt.fleming@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matt@console-pimps.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).