From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756865Ab1DLXVN (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2011 19:21:13 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:50856 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751867Ab1DLXVL (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2011 19:21:11 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:20:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20110412.162036.241924043.davem@davemloft.net> To: bp@amd64.org Cc: romieu@fr.zoreil.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, borislav.petkov@amd.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] r8169: Be verbose when unable to load fw patch From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1302615172-1646-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> References: <1302615172-1646-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Borislav Petkov Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:32:52 +0200 > From: Borislav Petkov > > When the driver fails loading the firmware, it doesn't say which patch > exactly it is missing. We have three different firmware images depending > on the hw revision, so mention the exact patch name it is unable to load > in the warning message. > > Cc: Francois Romieu > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Seems reasonable, Francois?